As someone with a CCL, I will be held criminally and civilly liable for ever round I fire. Cops, not so much. Why do we hold the police to a lower standard than we do CCL holders?
1 posted on
06/22/2015 11:20:08 AM PDT by
Teotwawki
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: Teotwawki
Because the gene pool is lower?
2 posted on
06/22/2015 11:23:51 AM PDT by
Rodentking
(There is no God but Yahweh and Moses is his prophet - http://www.airpower.blogspot.com/)
To: Teotwawki
Why do we hold the police to a lower standard than we do CCL holders?Because you're an evil white knucle-dragging hetero-breeder Bible-thumper and you're RAAAAAcist.
That's why. And don't you forget it.
3 posted on
06/22/2015 11:25:00 AM PDT by
Old Sarge
(Its the Sixties all over again, but with crappy music...)
To: Teotwawki
Just a question: can I go into this cops backyard and shoot his dog???
4 posted on
06/22/2015 11:26:32 AM PDT by
EXCH54FE
(Hurricane 416,Feisty Old Vet !!)
To: Teotwawki
The court would say “Well his heart was in the right place, accidents will happen. Next case >bang<”
6 posted on
06/22/2015 11:30:09 AM PDT by
SkyDancer
( I Was Told Nobody Is Perfect But Yet, Here I Am ...)
To: Teotwawki
What a world. Mailmen have more guts than cops do, nowadays.
7 posted on
06/22/2015 11:30:11 AM PDT by
Fido969
To: Teotwawki
Maybe the 4 year old was threatening him. You know, with a plastic toy or a smelly diaper.
8 posted on
06/22/2015 11:33:03 AM PDT by
PGR88
To: Teotwawki
Why do we hold the police to a lower standard than we do CCL holders? Will you come to my house and save me from the meth-head holding a gun to my head demanding a fix?
9 posted on
06/22/2015 11:34:07 AM PDT by
donna
(Polls are mob rule . . . faked.)
To: Teotwawki
Gee looking at those photos, it looks like white-trash city.
12 posted on
06/22/2015 11:38:00 AM PDT by
Fido969
To: Teotwawki
I thought the first piece on this a few days ago said the dog was on a leash.
Or was that another one. I’m losing count of the canine homicides.
Also, ditto to another poster. Why am I, as a CCDW holder held to a higher standard with a gun than a (supposedly) well trained LEO is held to?
15 posted on
06/22/2015 11:41:04 AM PDT by
ChildOfThe60s
(If you can remember the 60s, you weren't really there....)
To: Teotwawki
“Charging dog” my @$$!
The dog was barking!
Cops have been taught its ok to shoot barking dogs, so they do.
No “threat” is necessary.
16 posted on
06/22/2015 11:46:53 AM PDT by
G Larry
(Obama Hates America, Israel, Capitalism, Freedom, and Christianity.)
To: Teotwawki
We used to demand police officers be tough enough to take a dog bite and subdue the dog.
17 posted on
06/22/2015 11:47:14 AM PDT by
MrEdd
(Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
To: Teotwawki
This shoot first policy with family house pets has got to stop. Who and what the hell do these cops think they are?
Are they that big of babies that they can’t deal with a little hose pet without shooting them? Now they miss and shoot a little kid? This makes me sick.
18 posted on
06/22/2015 11:47:42 AM PDT by
Bullish
(Face it, insanity is not presidential.)
To: Teotwawki
I have said this many time on here. When I go to the range and there are LEO’s there I leave. They must not have ever been trained on firearm safety.
24 posted on
06/22/2015 12:10:43 PM PDT by
cork
(Gun control = hitting what you aim at)
To: Teotwawki
Why do we hold the police to a lower standard than we do CCL holders? Because shut up - or do you want more attention?
25 posted on
06/22/2015 12:12:13 PM PDT by
Talisker
(One who commands, must obey.)
To: Teotwawki
Because as government employees we just can’t expect better than DMV level sensibilities out of them.
26 posted on
06/22/2015 12:18:40 PM PDT by
Neidermeyer
("Our courts should not be collection agencies for crooks." — John Waihee, Governor of Hawaii, 1986-)
To: Teotwawki
May I note that they apparently also often see little alternative but to shoot a charging man. Cops in other countries routinely succeed in subduing people who get physical without shooting them.
Here, not so much.
I have no problem with cops shooting armed people who attack them. Routinely shooting unarmed people, I do have a problem.
To: Teotwawki
Wait...
If he MISSED the dog, thus hitting the child...
Did the bad old dog then KILL him???
No???
So. His life was NOT in any peril after all, huh???
THROW THIS CLOWN IN PRISON.
To: Teotwawki
Why do we hold the police to a lower standard than we do CCL holders?
We didn’t used to. A cop doing this 40 yrs ago even without hitting a person would have been fired.
Feminization of the job.
36 posted on
06/22/2015 2:32:53 PM PDT by
TalBlack
(Evil doesn't have a day job...)
To: Teotwawki
Note that this evil, clearly dangerous animal, despite the fact that its young mistress was shot, did *not* in fact, harm or threaten the officer.
38 posted on
06/22/2015 4:14:58 PM PDT by
Altariel
("Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!")
To: Teotwawki
Do not call the police for anything.
45 posted on
06/22/2015 6:51:01 PM PDT by
eyedigress
((Old storm chaser from the west))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson