The point was the the myth of [G]god[s] with children, virgin births, and all manner of other stories are common in the mythology of mankind -- and they are hardly "all but forgotten." Only an ignoramus doesn't know the story of Athena springing, fully formed, from the mind of Zeus, or of Perseus born to a virgin from a shower of gold.
That myths common on Earth might be repeated in galaxies long ago and far away is not in the least bit blasphemous. It is, as J.R.R. Tolkien would have said, "one of the ingredients in the pot."
Jews believe something. One of the things they believe is that the idea of [G]god[s] having children by virgin birth was common in the ancient, pagan world. It is one of their reasons for rejecting Christianity, and is hardly "all but forgotten."
My point was not at all touched by your point. My point being that myths having some elements in common does not mean that all events that have that element is a myth. I am aware of the Greek/Roman myth about Athena, etc. But no one to my knowledge, holds them today, which is part of the reason we can use these characters as symbols and brand names. There might be a stray Zoroastrian around, if one should pop n the board I will try not to offend him needlessly.
You describe yourself as a skeptic on religious matters in your well done profile. I am not. We are different kinds of conservatives, and you are certainly no newbie and you offer many contributnh posts. I am going to continue offering my opinion of what constitutes borderline blashemy, and will not take a correction from someone who offers a specious argument about ancient, all but forgotten myths as if they were 1:1 comparable. Frankly, you should be indifferent to it.