Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Perdogg

Most people who use superlatives when describing historical figures need to study more history.


3 posted on 06/14/2015 3:08:51 PM PDT by ThomasThomas ("YOUR BADGE! SHOW HIM YOUR BADGE!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ThomasThomas

However, he is considered to have been an administrative genius.


7 posted on 06/14/2015 3:18:32 PM PDT by CharlesOConnell (CharlesOConnell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: ThomasThomas

Yep. Henry VIII probably the worst, by far…almost as bad as Vlad the Impaler.


27 posted on 06/14/2015 4:48:30 PM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: ThomasThomas

Totally agree!


40 posted on 06/14/2015 7:04:46 PM PDT by matginzac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: ThomasThomas

I wholeheartedly agree.

The worst of the British monarchs was probably Stephen, last ruler of the House of Normandy.

Regardless, on the last of the worst were any of the German-speaking Hanoverian kings (which list includes George III, whom we overthrew; Henry VI (weak is the most flattering of his adjectives), Mary I, James II.

For that matter, Richard I “the Lionheart” spent a mere six months of his reign in England, spending the rest of it in the Crusades (two years at the siege of Acre alone), and in the hoosegow of some European king. About 30 years ago there was a bio of Richard I that argued he was one of the ablest British monarchs, but that’s difficult to argue, IMHO. :’)


60 posted on 06/15/2015 12:38:20 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson