To: alexander_busek
Yeah, nothing else is required: certainly not evidence. He backed it up with what he believes is evidence. If you have a problem with that, find the courage to say so in detail, rather that taking drive-by pot shots.
Otherwise you'll be mistaken for a punk.
81 posted on
06/13/2015 11:07:30 AM PDT by
Talisker
(One who commands, must obey.)
To: Talisker
He backed it up with what he believes is evidence. If you have a problem with that, find the courage to say so in detail, rather that taking drive-by pot shots. Otherwise you'll be mistaken for a punk.Your point is well taken!
I should have written:
Yeah, nothing else is required: certainly not evidence which would hold up under critical scrutiny (e.g., cross-examination in a courtroom, or with a panel of unbiased experts applying Aristotelian logic).
Regards,
104 posted on
06/13/2015 11:10:23 PM PDT by
alexander_busek
(Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson