To: Talisker
He backed it up with what he believes is evidence. If you have a problem with that, find the courage to say so in detail, rather that taking drive-by pot shots. Otherwise you'll be mistaken for a punk.Your point is well taken!
I should have written:
Yeah, nothing else is required: certainly not evidence which would hold up under critical scrutiny (e.g., cross-examination in a courtroom, or with a panel of unbiased experts applying Aristotelian logic).
Regards,
104 posted on
06/13/2015 11:10:23 PM PDT by
alexander_busek
(Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
To: alexander_busek
I should have written: Yeah, nothing else is required: certainly not evidence which would hold up under critical scrutiny (e.g., cross-examination in a courtroom, or with a panel of unbiased experts applying Aristotelian logic). LOL, yeah, just like all religious beliefs are, including yours.
Right?
So what religion have you found that does all that? Because I'm sure you wouldn't be a part of anything less.
Right?
116 posted on
06/14/2015 12:58:09 PM PDT by
Talisker
(One who commands, must obey.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson