Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: FredZarguna
6.022 × 1023 DOLLARS
$1 for each molecule in 2 grams of H2 . . . .

36 posted on 06/12/2015 11:29:23 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion ('Liberalism' is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: conservatism_IS_compassion
Actually, within the limits of significance it doesn't really matter, but ... the definition is the number of carbon atoms in a sample of exactly 12 grams pure carbon 12.

I can't now find a reference, but I vaguely recollect that hydrogen hasn't been used since 1933.

Hydrogen always seemed to make more sense to me. No nuclear binding energy to account for if the sample is pure 11H. Effectively the mass of 18 grams of H2 would be identical to the mass of a 2 moles of electrons plus a 2 moles of protons -- the electron-proton binding energy is, I believe, negligible to the degree of precision measurable.

But while conceptually simpler, I believe the constant itself was more easily fixed by x-ray crystallography. I first learned of it as 6.02 x 1023 then as 6.023 x 1023. It was changed [to four significant digits] in 1973, I think to 6.022 x 1023.

Anyway, the paper a trillion dollar Zimbabwe note is printed on has to be worth more than the currency, and eventually, even the mole will be too small. Then they'll print googolbucks.

41 posted on 06/12/2015 1:58:19 PM PDT by FredZarguna (It looks just like a Telefunken U-47 -- with leather.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson