Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: nopardons

“Aaaaaaaaaahh...but the records WERE sealed and whoever leaked them,only redacted the names, but left enough info so that anyone reading it, could easily figure out which sisters he had touched.”

No.

Springdale City Attorney Ernest Cate tells TMZ, the case file was never sealed. The reason — the police report wasn’t filed until 2006, 4 years after the molestations began. When the police report was filed, Josh Duggar was 18 ... an adult suspect, and therefore there was no basis for sealing the case.
Cate says he got a Freedom of Information request from a media outlet, and since it was a non-sealed case he was required to release it under the Freedom of Information Act. The names of the minor victims in the police report narrative were redacted.

Read more: http://www.tmz.com/2015/06/04/duggar-sealed-case-molestation-josh-jim-bob-michelle-fox-news/#ixzz3cLxUxtJL


167 posted on 06/06/2015 10:56:19 PM PDT by Oliviaforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]


To: Oliviaforever
But some of the "victims" were still underage,at that time, which means that those records should have been sealed!

Obviously, YOU have some agenda/a sick fascination with this case and though you apparently have read quite a few things about it, have posted lies.

172 posted on 06/06/2015 11:00:19 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson