Posted on 06/05/2015 10:15:49 AM PDT by Olog-hai
Veteran actor and gay rights activist Patrick Stewart has defended a Christian bakery which was found guilty of discrimination for refusing to bake a cake with a pro-gay marriage slogan.
Last month, a judge ruled that Ashers Baking Company in Northern Ireland had discriminated against a gay customer by refusing to make a cake with the words support gay marriage, along with a picture of Bert and Ernie from Sesame Street.
Gareth Lee commissioned the cake for an event to mark International Day Against Homophobia and Transphobia. The bakery initially accepted the order, but called Mr. Lee two days later to cancel.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.com.au ...
The baker probably should have refused on the grounds that he wouldn’t engage in copyright infringement.
Respect to Patrick Stewart, at least he has common sense in this issue.
The Baker is for Freedom of Expression BUT he didn't want to inflame a situation. (al la Pam Geller)
How’s he doing after Mel Gibson bit off his nose?
“Make it so.”
Ian McKellen will not be happy.
Hitting back at a SJB, directly, allows them to pull the whole faux outrage victimization bit.
Hitting back at them using a legal technically, tho, really ticks them off. Especially if they know you’re just using it to mask your real reasoning.
A decision so wrong that even a gay rights activist can’t agree with it. Thing is, this is a natural progression of the gay mafia’s cause. Denying anything to someone who is gay, for any reason, is by result, a crime.
There would have been rioting on Sesame Street
Yes, exactly. If a baker can be forced to write something offensive on a cake, then an actor can be forced to say something offensive.
However, that’s a challenging analogy to apply to a wedding cake. At least a plain one, without any sort of writing or topper, or other explicit message.
See my post above. Stewart is an actor before he’s a gay rights activist. So he gets the implications of forcing someone to convey a message (whether in writing or speaking) they disagree with.
Whether or not you agree with Patrick Stewart on gay rights, I’ll give him credit for a certain consistency. He may be all for the gays, but he’s also for the right to say no to them and against their efforts to force their agenda on those who cannot in good conscience support it.
I can accept that, whether or not I completely agree.
He doesn’t want to go where no man has gone before?......................
Yes, have to respect Stewart for being principled in this.
Though he is going to catch hell for it in the UK. They’ve pretty much destroyed Rupert Everett’s life for saying that gays should not be raising children.
Finally a gay activist with some brains. Although pointing out the writing on the wall just before the wall falls on you is a tad late. Nevertheless, better late than never. All Stewart is saying is, “hey wait a minute, I think we need to hold on to at least the last shred of personal freedom under the law, I don’t like the way the Muslims are smiling these days...”
The boy replied, 'My grandfather lived to be 107 years old.'
The man asked, 'Did your grandfather eat 6 chocolate bars at a time?'
The little boy answered, 'No, he minded his own damn business!'
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.