Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: discostu
Which not only clearly shows we lacked strategic goals (if we were thinking strategically we’d have let Patton keep going East like he wanted)

did the war result in lasting peace

Were these strategic goals for WWII? Should they have been?

47 posted on 06/02/2015 12:13:19 PM PDT by Future Snake Eater (CrossFit.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: Future Snake Eater

I don’t think we actually had any strategic goals for WWII. And yes they probably should have been. One of the big changes we’ve had the last few decades in how we view the world is the realization that if all you do with one war is set the stage for the next that first war was kind of pointless. And expending large quantities of human lives and pointless should really never be in the same sentence.


49 posted on 06/02/2015 12:16:37 PM PDT by discostu (In fact funk's as old as dirt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson