Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Boogieman
When you get to fractional pixels per meter, it’s more convenient to use meters per pixel :)

So unless there is another higher-resolution camera (or a higher resolution mode) aboard this craft, we really cannot expect to see much fine detail as Ceres is approached. At 480m/pixel, the smallest object we could see is 480 meters in size? Or is my understanding of this faulty?

49 posted on 05/29/2015 4:36:39 PM PDT by Blennos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: Blennos
So unless there is another higher-resolution camera (or a higher resolution mode) aboard this craft, we really cannot expect to see much fine detail as Ceres is approached. At 480m/pixel, the smallest object we could see is 480 meters in size? Or is my understanding of this faulty?

No, because the camera will be closer the parallax will allow each pixel to encompass fewer pixels. If the camera were sitting on Ceres, then you'd see millimeters per pixel, because the camera would be that close. . . if it could macro focus (unlikely). My Aunt worked for NSA before her retirement in the 1980s and they had military satellites then that could, she said, read the license plate numbers in the Kremlin's parking lot from 117 mile orbits. . . If atmospheric conditions were just right, which was very rare. Those cameras then were analogue and had far less resolution than do these cameras on Dawn. When Dawn gets close enough, we will see a lot more detail. We just have to wait.

50 posted on 05/29/2015 6:11:34 PM PDT by Swordmaker ( This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users contnue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson