A common motif is the insistence that all science should be done in a laboratory — an attempt to throw away gravity from the very beginning, because one can’t put a solar system or a galaxy in a laboratory.
That is a total misrepresentation of what the claims of EU proponents are making. EU proponents DO NOT insist that all science should be done in the laboratory. That's a straw man fallacy. More proof your article proves nothing and is wrong, arguing points never made.
EU proponents state that many of the things that are being seen in the Universe are duplicatable in the plasma laboratory and are completely scalable to the macrocosmic simply by the addition of more power. . . and these laboratory experiments have indicated things to look for that were eventually FOUND in space in the macrocosmic scale, validating the observed linkage. This much simpler explanation can explain everything we see without invoking the "magic" fairy dust of dark matter and magical power of dark energy, adding tremendous fudge factors into their observations, which Gravity cosmology repeatedly trots out to get their theories to even work.
The EU cosmology does not require any magic fairy dust or magical power to work.
Thanks for the attempt. . . but arguing things that were never claimed is poor debating technique.
The real problem is that Gravity cosmologists have been the ones that have literally thrown away a force that is 39 orders of magnitude stronger than gravity, is demonstrably equally infinite in reach, can be seen in action right in front of their eyes every where we look, and instead of selected a the weaker force as the ultimate driver of the Universe.
They made an unsupportable declaration that "There are no charges in space!" and proceeded as if it were true, without evidence. Yet everything we've discovered since that declaration shows us that there are charges everywhere we look in space, but they refuse to revisit that declaration. It is why they are continually surprised at what they find. They cannot help but be surprised when they deny it can exist! Their declaration was and is ultimately illogical!
Try answering the questions about the objects I posted above from a gravity cosmology that WORKS. . . because the gravity cosmologists have so far failed miserably. They are constantly being surprised by what is being seen in deep space that EU cosmologists are predicting will be seen.
The test of any theory is how well does it predict future discoveries. So far Gravity Cosmology is failing miserably, while EU cosmology is doing very well in the prediction business.
Start by telling us how a strong magnetic field can exist without an equally strong flowing electric current. . . and then tell us through what medium is that electric current flowing to build that magnetic field. Yet Gravity cosmology seems to think that magnetic fields exist all, against all science, all by themselves.
They've finally started to get the idea with the sun, talking about magnetic "disconnection and reconnection" and the "explosions" associated with them. . . but they are ignoring what causes them. They've just renamed something that Hannes Alfvèn discovered over 100 years ago and named then. . . but they don't want to give any credence to the EU people who have been telling them this for years.
While you are at it, try telling us how a lower solar atmospheric temperature sun of just 8000 K (with a surface temperature even lower) can, by mere convection, give rise to an upper solar atmosphere temperature of more than 1,500,000 K? I know you can't because the solar physicists can't explain it. The EU cosmologists can. How do you explain the solar wind accelerates the farther you get from the sun? Gravity cosmology cannot explain it.