Posted on 05/17/2015 7:25:09 AM PDT by B4Ranch
Police officers are more likely to be struck by lightning than be held financially accountable for their actions.Law professor Joanna C. Schwartz (paraphrased)
In a democratic society, observed Oakland police chief Sean Whent, people have a say in how they are policed.
Unfortunately, if you can be kicked, punched, tasered, shot, intimidated, harassed, stripped, searched, brutalized, terrorized, wrongfully arrested, and even killed by a police officer, and that officer is never held accountable for violating your rights and his oath of office to serve and protect, never forced to make amends, never told that what he did was wrong, and never made to change his modus operandi, then you dont live in a constitutional republic.
You live in a police state.
It doesnt even matter that crime is at historic lows and most cities are safer than they have been in generations, for residents and officers alike, as the New York Times reports.
What matters is whether youre going to make it through a police confrontation alive and with your health and freedoms intact. For a growing number of Americans, those confrontations do not end well.
As David O. Brown, the Dallas chief of police, noted: Sometimes it seems like our young officers want to get into an athletic event with people they want to arrest. They have a dont retreat mentality. They feel like theyre warriors and they cant back down when someone is running from them, no matter how minor the underlying crime is.
Making matters worse, in the cop culture that is America today, the Bill of Rights doesnt amount to much. Unless, that is, its the Law Enforcement Officers Bill of Rights (LEOBoR), which protects police officers from being subjected to the kinds of debilitating indignities heaped upon the average citizen.
Most Americans, oblivious about their own rights, arent even aware that police officers have their own Bill of Rights. Yet at the same time that our own protections against government abuses have been reduced to little more than historic window dressing, 14 states have already adopted LEOBoRswritten by police unions and being considered by many more states and Congresswhich provides police officers accused of a crime with special due process rights and privileges not afforded to the average citizen.
In other words, the LEOBoR protects police officers from being treated as we are treated during criminal investigations: questioned unmercifully for hours on end, harassed, harangued, browbeaten, denied food, water and bathroom breaks, subjected to hostile interrogations, and left in the dark about our accusers and any charges and evidence against us.
Not only are officers given a 10-day cooling-off period during which they cannot be forced to make any statements about the incident, but when they are questioned, it must be for a reasonable length of time, at a reasonable hour, by only one or two investigators (who must be fellow policemen), and with plenty of breaks for food and water.
According to investigative journalist Eli Hager, the most common rights afforded police officers accused of wrongdoing are as follows:
Its a pretty sweet deal if you can get it, I suppose: protection from the courts, immunity from wrongdoing, paid leave while youre under investigation, and the assurance that you wont have to spend a dime of your own money in your defense. And yet these LEOBoR epitomize everything that is wrong with America today.
Once in a while, the system appears to work on the side of justice, and police officers engaged in wrongdoing are actually charged for abusing their authority and using excessive force against American citizens.
Yet even in these instances, its still the American taxpayer who foots the bill.
For example, Baltimore taxpayers have paid roughly $5.7 million since 2011 over lawsuits stemming from police abuses, with an additional $5.8 million going towards legal fees. If the six Baltimore police officers charged with the death of Freddie Gray are convicted, you can rest assured it will be the Baltimore taxpayers who feel the pinch.
New York taxpayers have shelled out almost $1,130 per year per police officer (there are 34,500 officers in the NYPD) to address charges of misconduct. That translates to $38 million every year just to clean up after these so-called public servants.
Over a 10-year-period, Oakland, Calif., taxpayers were made to cough up more than $57 million (curiously enough, the same amount as the citys deficit back in 2011) in order to settle accounts with alleged victims of police abuse.
Chicago taxpayers were asked to pay out nearly $33 million on one day alone to victims of police misconduct, with one person slated to receive $22.5 million, potentially the largest single amount settled on any one victim. The City has paid more than half a billion dollars to victims over the course of a decade. The Chicago City Council actually had to borrow $100 million just to pay off lawsuits arising over police misconduct in 2013. The citys payout for 2014 was estimated to be in the same ballpark, especially with cases pending such as the one involving the man who was reportedly sodomized by a police officers gun in order to force him to cooperate.
Over 78% of the funds paid out by Denver taxpayers over the course of a decade arose as a result of alleged abuse or excessive use of force by the Denver police and sheriff departments. Meanwhile, taxpayers in Ferguson, Missouri, are being asked to pay $40 million in compensationmore than the citys entire budgetfor police officers treating them as if they were war combatants, using tactics like beating, rubber bullets, pepper spray, and stun grenades, while the plaintiffs were peacefully protesting, sitting in a McDonalds, and in one case walking down the street to visit relatives.
Thats just a small sampling of the most egregious payouts, but just about every communitylarge and smallfeels the pinch when it comes to compensating victims who have been subjected to deadly or excessive force by police.
The ones who rarely ever feel the pinch are the officers accused or convicted of wrongdoing, even if they are disciplined or terminated by their department, criminally prosecuted, or even imprisoned. Indeed, a study published in the NYU Law Review reveals that 99.8% of the monies paid in settlements and judgments in police misconduct cases never come out of the officers own pockets, even when state laws require them to be held liable. Moreover, these officers rarely ever have to pay for their own legal defense.
For instance, law professor Joanna C. Schwartz references a case in which three Denver police officers chased and then beat a 16-year-old boy, stomping on the boys back while using a fence for leverage, breaking his ribs and causing him to suffer kidney damage and a lacerated liver. The cost to Denver taxpayers to settle the lawsuit: $885,000. The amount the officers contributed: 0.
Kathryn Johnston, 92 years old, was shot and killed during a SWAT team raid that went awry. Attempting to cover their backs, the officers falsely claimed Johnstons home was the site of a cocaine sale and went so far as to plant marijuana in the house to support their claim. The cost to Atlanta taxpayers to settle the lawsuit: $4.9 million. The amount the officers contributed: 0.
Meanwhile, in Albuquerque, a police officer was convicted of raping a woman in his police car, in addition to sexually assaulting four other women and girls, physically abusing two additional women, and kidnapping or falsely imprisoning five men and boys. The cost to the Albuquerque taxpayers to settle the lawsuit: $1,000,000. The amount the officer contributed: 0.
Human Rights Watch notes that taxpayers actually pay three times for officers who repeatedly commit abuses: once to cover their salaries while they commit abuses; next to pay settlements or civil jury awards against officers; and a third time through payments into police defense funds provided by the cities.
Still, the number of times a police officer is actually held accountable for wrongdoing while on the job is miniscule compared to the number of times cops are allowed to walk away with little more than a slap on the wrist.
A large part of the problem can be chalked up to influential police unions and laws providing for qualified immunity, not to mention these Law Enforcement Officers Bill of Rights laws, which allow officers to walk away without paying a dime for their wrongdoing.
Another part of the problem is rampant cronyism among government bureaucrats: those deciding whether a police officer should be immune from having to personally pay for misbehavior on the job all belong to the same system, all with a vested interest in protecting the police and their infamous code of silence: city and county attorneys, police commissioners, city councils and judges.
Most of all, what were dealing with is systemic corruption that protects wrongdoing and recasts it in a noble light. However, there is nothing noble about government agents who kick, punch, shoot and kill defenseless individuals. There is nothing just about police officers rendered largely immune from prosecution for wrongdoing. There is nothing democratic about the word of a government agent being given greater weight in court than that of the average citizen. And no good can come about when the average citizen has no real means of defense against a system that is weighted in favor of government bureaucrats.
So if you want a recipe for disaster, this is it: Take police cadets, train them in the ways of war, dress and equip them for battle, teach them to see the people they serve not as human beings but as suspects and enemies, and then indoctrinate them into believing that their main priority is to make it home alive at any cost. While youre at it, spend more time drilling them on how to use a gun (58 hours) and employ defensive tactics (49 hours) than on how to calm a situation before resorting to force (8 hours).
Then, once theyre hyped up on their own authority and the power of the badge and their gun, throw in a few court rulings suggesting that security takes precedence over individual rights, set it against a backdrop of endless wars and militarized law enforcement, and then add to the mix a populace distracted by entertainment, out of touch with the workings of their government, and more inclined to let a few sorry souls suffer injustice than challenge the status quo or appear unpatriotic.
Thats not to discount the many honorable police officers working thankless jobs across the country in order to serve and protect their fellow citizens, but there can be no denying that, as journalist Michael Daly acknowledges, there is a troublesome cop culture that tends to dehumanize or at least objectify suspected lawbreakers of whatever race. The instant you are deemed a candidate for arrest, you become not so much a person as a perp.
Older cops are equally troubled by this shift in how police are being trained to view Americansas things, not people. Daly had a veteran police officer join him to review the video footage of 43-year-old Eric Garner crying out and struggling to breathe as cops held him in a chokehold. (In yet another example of how the legal system and the police protect their own, no police officers were charged for Garners death.) Daly describes the veteran officers reaction to the footage, which as Daly points out, constitutes a moral indictment not so much of what the police did but of what the police did not do:
I dont see anyone in that video saying, Look, we got to ease up, says the veteran officer. Wheres the human side of you in that youve got a guy saying, I cant breathe? The veteran officer goes on, Somebody needs to say, Stop it! Thats whats missing here was a voice of reason. The only voice were hearing is of Eric Garner. The veteran officer believes Garner might have survived had anybody heeded his pleas. He could have had a chance, says the officer, who is black. But you got to believe hes a human being first. A human being saying, I cant breathe.
As I point out in my new book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, when all is said and done, the various problems were facing todaymilitarized police, police shootings of unarmed people, the electronic concentration camp being erected around us, SWAT team raids, etc.can be attributed to the fact that our government and its agents have ceased to see us as humans first.
Then again, perhaps we are just as much to blame for this sorry state of affairs. After all, if we want to be treated like human beingswith dignity and worththen we need to start treating those around us in the same manner. As Martin Luther King Jr. warned in a speech given exactly one year to the day before he was killed: We must rapidly begin the shift from a thing-oriented society to a person-oriented society. When machines and computers, profit motives and property rights are considered more important than people, the giant triplets of racism, materialism, and militarism are incapable of being conquered.
Some people's troubles are other's designed accomplishments.
I submit that there be a jury duty pool begun for each class of police training academy. A citizen group which attends all the classes and training in order to report fairly on what is getting into the heads of todays cops.
Change begins with knowing what's feeding the root.
You bet! My previous argument was not that these rules are good, but just that they are internal rules, nothing more. And as such, they can be turned on or off at contract time. To call them a "Bill of Rights" is to add unnecessary drama to the situation. A minor point, I know.
In the ideal, we could vote with our feet as well as on election day. We vote to live in a community that has a reputation for tough police, or vote for a town with a reputation for laid-back police.
Most of us live in a Metro area where we could choose between dozens of communities, each with its own combination of schools, police and other institutions.
Unfortunately, most towns are now dependent on the cocaine peddled by outsiders. If the town tried to a referendum to raise taxes for pay for that new shiny object the voters would vote down the referendum. So the town elders go for the free cocaine. But then they have to do the bidding of the cocaine dealers.
May want to look at actions being taken.
We now avoid the police at all cost. I would not call the cops to come to our house unless we had to shoot an intruder. Other than that no way.
There is no situation that can not be made worse by calling the Cops.
Yeah, mimes deserve anything they get :-)
Hence the Left’s push for Federalizing the police forces....
I cannot argue.
Snips of video like that are disturbing, but without background or context, we may jump to conclusions. Was that individual on the ground reaching for a firearm near him but out of camera angle? Was the female brutally knocked down a murderess leaving the scene? Or were they both instances of cops behaving badly?
And of course, if the individuals kicked in the head and slammed to the floor were Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn, I’d be cheering the cops!
We live in a police state? Really? The police need support, not idiotic diatribes. Or do you just want to do away with all law enforcement? Good luck with that.
Was the mime following police orders? Looks to me like he was being a wise guy, taunting the officer.
Bingo! Another clip most likely taken out of context as if the “victim” was a pure, innocent bystander. Kind of like Michael Brown.
Ping.
Clowns are evil and mimes are super clowns which means that they are super evil.
Perhaps we could make an exception in this case.
He probably got promoted to Assistant Chief.
One does not. Should one attempt to defend themselves, they will shortly have more holes in them that a piece of Swiss cheese. Plus 40or 50 police dogs trying to tear their guts out. It is best to take your beatdown like a man and then go from there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.