Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Dave W
This is a discussion board, and one of the better ones where logical analysis often develops and holds its own among a user base with a higher intelligence.

What I've presented are facts about Carly's record of failure at HP including her acceptance of tens of millions of dollars (in violation of HP policy) after having laid off tens of thousands of lesser-paid workers, and her campaign practices including competing against a fellow Republican using a bizarre attack ad (just youtube "demon sheep" to see it).

On the other hand, alternate comments attempt to drag the discussion down to the personal level, including accusations that my motivations include being an ex-HP employee or someone who is receiving pay for their opinions (backed up with precisely zero evidence).

It's not about being "upset" instead it's about the attempts to deflect from observation and discussion of Carly's true record (just as we shouldn't be mis-directed from Hillary's record), that should concern all who participate here.

60 posted on 05/11/2015 2:50:18 PM PDT by research99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: research99
No. You are a one note Johnny. You have not told me how you disagree with Carly on policy. Policy is substance. All you have is a grudge against her.

Now, I can understand if you disagree with her views on the deficit, Obamacare, immigration, the budget, etc. etc.

Instead, your whole complaint about Carly is she laid off people and took a bunch of money when she left. Those are grudges and are superficial. We all know about the money. It was all in the news frequently. We all know it went to court and we all know she won. It wasn't like she climbed a fence and broke into a safe at HP headquarters. You are not informing anybody about anything. We KNOW it.

My god, this country is going down the tubes and you are harping on something that makes no difference to policy and the future of this country. Compared to Hillary, Carly glistens like the snow.

And you refuse to address the glowing reevaluations of her record at HP. Further, she is quite good articulating everything that should satisfy your objections.

So in summary, you inform us about something we all know about. You are not contributing to the discourse since we all know what occurred. You just repeat it ad nauseam. Further, your objection is not based on policy, but based on old news, old circumstances and not on anything that is relevant to the current issues facing this country.

It is clear you have a petty grudge because of something personal that happened - a layoff or you are just a paid nuisance. Either way, it cheapens you and your comments.

61 posted on 05/11/2015 5:40:02 PM PDT by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson