Now, I can understand if you disagree with her views on the deficit, Obamacare, immigration, the budget, etc. etc.
Instead, your whole complaint about Carly is she laid off people and took a bunch of money when she left. Those are grudges and are superficial. We all know about the money. It was all in the news frequently. We all know it went to court and we all know she won. It wasn't like she climbed a fence and broke into a safe at HP headquarters. You are not informing anybody about anything. We KNOW it.
My god, this country is going down the tubes and you are harping on something that makes no difference to policy and the future of this country. Compared to Hillary, Carly glistens like the snow.
And you refuse to address the glowing reevaluations of her record at HP. Further, she is quite good articulating everything that should satisfy your objections.
So in summary, you inform us about something we all know about. You are not contributing to the discourse since we all know what occurred. You just repeat it ad nauseam. Further, your objection is not based on policy, but based on old news, old circumstances and not on anything that is relevant to the current issues facing this country.
It is clear you have a petty grudge because of something personal that happened - a layoff or you are just a paid nuisance. Either way, it cheapens you and your comments.
Except, of course, no evidence to support your claims of a layoff or payment to be a 'nuisance' actually appears here!
Why? They just ain't so.
But just for the sake of continuing the discussion, let's move on, past her personal enrichment for over $20 million by violating re-numeration policies at HP, to other factual aspects of Carly's actual record.
What is your defense of the "demon sheep" ad Carly ran against fellow Republican Tom Campbell in 2010? Is that the sort of "low blow" that you accuse others like me of?