Carly's tenure at HP is being reevaluated as I earlier communicated. The WSJ has given her credit for HP's turnaround saying that she is the one that put the process in place. WSJ is not the only outlet reevaluating.
I must say your comments are general (con-artist, record of failure) not specific. Many others disagree.
How can one person at the bottom of the polls get you so upset? That is one of the questions you won't answer. It builds credibility to my belief you are bitter and you or someone in your family was laid off - that you have not denied.
Talk to someone to get all this angst out of your system.
What I've presented are facts about Carly's record of failure at HP including her acceptance of tens of millions of dollars (in violation of HP policy) after having laid off tens of thousands of lesser-paid workers, and her campaign practices including competing against a fellow Republican using a bizarre attack ad (just youtube "demon sheep" to see it).
On the other hand, alternate comments attempt to drag the discussion down to the personal level, including accusations that my motivations include being an ex-HP employee or someone who is receiving pay for their opinions (backed up with precisely zero evidence).
It's not about being "upset" instead it's about the attempts to deflect from observation and discussion of Carly's true record (just as we shouldn't be mis-directed from Hillary's record), that should concern all who participate here.