Carly’s presence in the race should be taken as a personal affront by each and every voter.
Here is a woman with a track record of failure, talking volumes of corporate-speak and posturing as a winner, in hopes she can con the room again (just like she did at HP).
Carly is effective against the other con-artist woman in the race, Hillary, because they’re playing the same game. “It takes one to know one” certainly applies here.
(Hillary will again tank in 2016, just like in 2008, because no one wants to put her in a position where we have to hear her speak).
Now, can I get paid for this political advocacy (which is being provided for free)? It seems easier to hire out as a consultant and get paid, rather than be accused for it and not get paid.
Maybe if I was a con like Carly, I would already have my $20 million severance from HP, and I could spend my time doing something other than pointing out the obvious about dishonest would-be politicians on blog sites.
Carly's tenure at HP is being reevaluated as I earlier communicated. The WSJ has given her credit for HP's turnaround saying that she is the one that put the process in place. WSJ is not the only outlet reevaluating.
I must say your comments are general (con-artist, record of failure) not specific. Many others disagree.
How can one person at the bottom of the polls get you so upset? That is one of the questions you won't answer. It builds credibility to my belief you are bitter and you or someone in your family was laid off - that you have not denied.
Talk to someone to get all this angst out of your system.