Your comments do not appear detached, but very personal. Carly is not toxic at all, unless you take her candidacy as a personal affront as you consistently demonstrate.
You seem bright, but some of your comments belie that, so the other option is you are paid by another campaign to tamp down any enthusiasm for Carly. That does happen.
First, you write that Hillary needs to be exposed. She is exposed in all her glory and Carly is helping expose her and keeping it in the news. Second, the other candidates will not go after Hillary until someone wins the nomination. That is how it works. Oh, there will be perfunctory statements concerning Hillary from all the candidates, but the ads, strategy and money is all going to be focused on winning the nomination because if one does not win the nomination, one can't advance to the general election. I'm sure all camps think there will be plenty of time to go after Hillary as it becomes clear who is going to win the nomination.
Next, I find it intriguing you are focusing your energies on someone who is receiving 3% of the support in the latest NH poll. Carly does not seem to be a threat to win the nomination. No one expects her to win the nomination, including herself. It was reported last week, that someone close to her campaign acknowledged she would accept the VP slot, if it came to that.
So if no one expects her to win the nomination, why the huffing and puffing about bad ol' Carly?
In review, someone who is a minor player in this whole nominating process is able to motivate you to post emotional comments in Carly threads...interesting. You have an agenda, it's personal and/or part of another campaign in which you are paid to keep Carly enthusiasm down.
Before I forget, exactly who is Hillary going to lose to in the democrat nominating process? Webb at 1% or perhaps it will be Socialist Sanders - yes, he does seem to be a threat (LOL). O'Malley is a twit and very unlikeable. He is going no where. Exactly who do you think is going to come out of no where to challenge Hillary. Elizabeth says she is not going to run, so that leaves Biden and he is not going to beat Hillary. He has the ego to think he can, but I'm sure he is being leaned on not to run.
Carly is doing her job perfectly at the moment. She is the only one focusing on Hillary - has not criticized the other candidates and her reward will be the VP slot on the ticket. It's a perfect fit for the pubs. I will follow your comments and if it as I think it is, I will find a rich history of your anti Carly posts all over this website and I will be there with you reminding all you have a personal/paid agenda. The bottom line is that someone who is far down the totem pole and has no hope to win the nomination attracts someone like you to go after her makes me believe it is personal/paid.
Carly’s presence in the race should be taken as a personal affront by each and every voter.
Here is a woman with a track record of failure, talking volumes of corporate-speak and posturing as a winner, in hopes she can con the room again (just like she did at HP).
Carly is effective against the other con-artist woman in the race, Hillary, because they’re playing the same game. “It takes one to know one” certainly applies here.
(Hillary will again tank in 2016, just like in 2008, because no one wants to put her in a position where we have to hear her speak).
Now, can I get paid for this political advocacy (which is being provided for free)? It seems easier to hire out as a consultant and get paid, rather than be accused for it and not get paid.
Maybe if I was a con like Carly, I would already have my $20 million severance from HP, and I could spend my time doing something other than pointing out the obvious about dishonest would-be politicians on blog sites.