And this is supposed to be reassuring that the jury would not subjectively favor Apple?
You assume that everything Apple does or claims is dishonest or nefarious.
No, I don't. I just think that in this case they exaggerate their claims because it makes them money and increases their prestige. It may be good business, but it is not good ethics, which does incline me to believe it is indeed a legacy of Steve Jobs.
This sort of behavior would appear to have his fingerprints all over it.
And again you prove my thesis that you see dishonesty in everything you look at.