More twisting of stats by you. If you are gong to include fumbles, then you should include rushing TD’s, which were incredible for a QB.
In the games he lost, Tebow did not protect the ball well, however like many QB’s he took more chances when he was behind. But every QB has bad games. In the games he won, which was the majority, he protected the ball very well, and had an incredible stat of scores per snap. The stats are in his favor for being an above average QB. The only thing you have on your side is he doesn’t fit the modern NFL prototype for a QB, so as usual, you resort to name calling once again.
There’s nothing wrong with including fumbles. Not fumbling is part of protecting the ball. And for a QB that runs often than that’s an important stat.
Well now you’re in rather obvious territory. Yes when he turned the ball over less he was more likely to win. Part of Tebow’s problem is that most of his games, even the wins, were bad games. Any time a QB goes through a game with less than 10 completions that’s a bad game.
The stats are NOT in his favor being above average. His completion percentage and his QB rating are both SIGNIFICANTLY below average. The only thing in your favor is that the defense shaved 15 points a game off what they allowed, which gave his crappy stats a better than even chance of winning the game. He can’t complete passes, his stats are TERRIBLE, and only a cultist would think otherwise. If you don’t want to be labeled a cultist stop acting like one.