[Olog-hai]

Is it? All for the mammon of unrighteousness to fund lobbies? Is that how the apostles did it?

[kanawa]

I have a suspicion that few would accept the service the business is offering.
If they do, it is an opportunity to express your faith to those that may need it.

[ClearCase_guy]

It's actually fairly clever. The homosexuals are essentially inviting Christians to come to a homosexual event and evangelize. It's a golden opportunity which would not likely occur if the homosexuals were not making special effort to offend and shut-down Christian businesses. Their efforts would back-fire beautifully.

It's not about the money. It's never about the money. It's about the message. This spreads the Christian message where it is needed. That's what Jesus would do.

[RoosterRedux]

All for the mammon of unrighteousness to fund lobbies?

I don't think that's the point. The point is to kill the enthusiasm of the gays assaulting Christian businesses and thereby stop them altogether.

[tanknetter]

Is it? All for the mammon of unrighteousness to fund lobbies? Is that how the apostles did it?

The question there is, if the policy incentivizes the happy couple to walk away and take their business elsewhere, and no goods/services are exchanged for money, does the whole "mammon of unrighteousness" really apply?

Remember what the goal is here: to work within the framework of established law (which is increasingly intolerant of freedom of conscience/religion claims) to make the problem go away.

[American Constitutionalist]

How can it be considered unrighteousness Mammon ( money ) when it is a ligitimate business ?

What about the money these business owners get from non-gay costumers ?

Have you ever gotten a refund check from the government ?

Any money from the government is unrighteousness mammon.

Any money you get from a big corporate bank who steals money from the poor people with excessive interest rates is unrighteousness mammon.

[Smokin' Joe]

All for the mammon of unrighteousness to fund lobbies? Is that how the apostles did it?

In the rare instances where such mammon would be forthcoming, turn it against them. Otherwise, "killing them with kindness" is a viable approach--and it is obvious that the courts are not going to provide Christian business owners any relief from the Homosexual jihad.

[CodeToad]

Think of it this way: “Gosh, how can we get some of that homosexual’s money away from him so he doesn’t give it to Hillary’s campaign? I know, let’s sell him something so he won’t have the money! Then, we can give it to Cruz’s campaign!”

That’s is how to think of this.