Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Timber Rattler

Right! No possibility that there is a child in the yard that the guy is running toward, no possibility that he had a knife, no...wait, you have seen it all and have decided.


24 posted on 04/08/2015 1:16:23 PM PDT by Dutchboy88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Dutchboy88

You sure like the taste of boots, don’t you?

The cop’s initial testimony (before the video came out) has already been made public. He claimed that he had to shoot the victim because the victim had his taser and the cop was in fear for his life, so he shot in self-defense.

What the video shows is that the cop is lying: his life was not in danger, the victim did not have a weapon, and the cop murdered him.


33 posted on 04/08/2015 1:19:08 PM PDT by dinodino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Dutchboy88

The fact that the cop planted the taser next to his victim, precludes any likelihood of the decedent having had a weapon. Had he had a weapon that his murderer knew about, the murderer would not have felt compelled to plant one on the scene.


63 posted on 04/08/2015 1:29:01 PM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Dutchboy88
a child in the yard that the guy is running toward,

Quick. Spray eight rounds in that direction.

79 posted on 04/08/2015 1:36:03 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Dutchboy88

Yea, maybe the victim was really an alien invader.


94 posted on 04/08/2015 1:46:52 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Dutchboy88

Oh PLEASE. How about the possibility that there was a child beyond the dead man and the cop could have killed the child? You don’t shoot a man in the back because of the vague possibility that he has a knife in his pocket.

Bootlicker, thy name is Dutchboy88.


156 posted on 04/08/2015 2:52:15 PM PDT by Shimmer1 (Never in history has any government ever wanted its people to be defenseless for any good reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Dutchboy88

This crowd seems to think that no matter what the perp did to the LEO, once the perp turns his back to the cop and runs, he is free to leave. No more threat to the populace, etc. Insanity.


169 posted on 04/08/2015 3:39:00 PM PDT by SgtHooper (Anyone who remembers the 60's, wasn't there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Dutchboy88

“Right! No possibility that there is a child in the yard that the guy is running toward, no possibility that he had a knife, no...wait, you have seen it all and have decided.”

Even if the defense can come up with a plausible justification for shooting the man in the back, there’s no excuse for planting the taser or for lying about performing CPR. None. The coverup points to guilt. Just for that, I wouldn’t believe a damn thing that this cop said. He’s a proven liar.

I do not see this as a case of a cop ‘killing a black man’. I see this as a cop ‘killing a citizen’. I’m a citizen. My kids and husband are citizens. It’s the job of the police to enforce the law - not break it. With their position of power, it’s vital that they are held accountable for abuse against us citizens.


196 posted on 04/09/2015 6:09:10 AM PDT by Marie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson