Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Dutchboy88

“Right! No possibility that there is a child in the yard that the guy is running toward, no possibility that he had a knife, no...wait, you have seen it all and have decided.”

Even if the defense can come up with a plausible justification for shooting the man in the back, there’s no excuse for planting the taser or for lying about performing CPR. None. The coverup points to guilt. Just for that, I wouldn’t believe a damn thing that this cop said. He’s a proven liar.

I do not see this as a case of a cop ‘killing a black man’. I see this as a cop ‘killing a citizen’. I’m a citizen. My kids and husband are citizens. It’s the job of the police to enforce the law - not break it. With their position of power, it’s vital that they are held accountable for abuse against us citizens.


196 posted on 04/09/2015 6:09:10 AM PDT by Marie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Marie
"I see this as a cop ‘killing a citizen’. I’m a citizen. My kids and husband are citizens. It’s the job of the police to enforce the law - not break it. With their position of power, it’s vital that they are held accountable for abuse against us citizens."

Well, you and your husband and kids just strut around proud of your perfection...the rest of the adults will try and keep your little family safe...unless you would like to step up and go out there in the line of fire. No? Of course not.

198 posted on 04/09/2015 9:20:49 AM PDT by Dutchboy88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies ]

To: Marie

It’s not clear at this point that the officer was attempting to plant the taser.

First, when Officer Slager dropped the taser next to Scott, another officer, who was attending Scott, was facing Officer Slager and could clearly see that he was dropping the taser at the scene. Both officers knew that they were being watched and/or recorded as evidenced by their visual acknowledgment of the witness’s presence. They’re trained to know where observers are standing in such situations. The other officer made no indication that anything out of the ordinary was going on with the taser being moved, which would be very odd if he thought Slager was planting evidence in the presence of a witness.

Second, the taser had been discharged and the probes were attached to Scott’s clothing. There are likely standard procedures for removing the probes and securing the weapon. One would not expect an officer to leave his loaded service weapon 25+ feet away.

Third, in my post #177 above, Officer Slager appears to notice the taser on the ground to his right lying near Scott. He bends down, picks it up, & appears to holster or secure it. So, it was not part of the crime scene when the scene was processed. It also appears that the attending officer had moved the taser from where Officer Slager dropped it. Perhaps he did so when he was removing the probes. That is unclear.

Officer Slager was still the lone officer on scene when he hurried to retrieve the taser. Being alone in a situation that could quickly escalate with witnesses gathering, he seems to have been securing a loose weapon so it couldn’t be picked up by gathering witnesses. When he was returning to Scott’s body, the second officer walked onto the scene.

It seems evident to me that Officer Slager intentionally killed Walter Scott, but it doesn’t seem clear to me that he was attempting to plant the taser.


202 posted on 04/09/2015 9:51:14 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson