Indian Country -- History Got it Wrong: Scientists Now Say Serpent Mound as Old as Aristotle
1 posted on
04/08/2015 10:00:16 AM PDT by
SunkenCiv
To: SunkenCiv
“gobble it up” sounds just SO scientific! :-)
2 posted on
04/08/2015 10:03:49 AM PDT by
left that other site
(You shall know the Truth, and The Truth Shall Set You Free.)
To: SunkenCiv
What is new about Serpent Mound is that it might be far more ancient than currently thought. Some archaeologists have recently discovered evidence that it was constructed around 300 B.C. by the Adena culture. That contrasts with the prevailing school of thought that it is about 920 years old [1095 A.D.] and was built by the Fort Ancient culture...
1,400 years is a helluva big difference....
3 posted on
04/08/2015 10:13:23 AM PDT by
Alex Murphy
("the defacto Leader of the FR Calvinist Protestant Brigades")
To: SunkenCiv
2300 years old would make it as old as Archimedes, not as old as Aristotle...but the 2300 figure is probably not precise. If Aristotle was alive he would be almost ready to celebrate his 2400th birthday.
To: SunkenCiv
Besides sitting and watching TV instead of out watching stars, modern man has created calenders to mark seasons.
To: SunkenCiv
Well worth a visit if you're in the area.
To: SunkenCiv; ADemocratNoMore; Akron Al; arbee4bush; agrace; ATOMIC_PUNK; Badeye; Bikers4Bush; ...
Ohio Ping
Theres something new about the very old Great Serpent Mound, the earthen snake effigy that stretches a quarter of a mile along the terrain in Adams County in southern Ohio...
To: SunkenCiv
When it said “Serpent Mound,” I thought the article was going to be about Capitol Hill.
14 posted on
04/09/2015 4:25:29 AM PDT by
Flag_This
(You can't spell "treason" without the "O".)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson