To: jazusamo
" it’s a mountain lion."
Not from the length of the tail it is not.
To: doorgunner69
Whatever happened to its tail is unknown but it looks like it was severed in some manner.
If that’s a 4 to 5 foot shark it’s a mountain lion.
23 posted on
04/07/2015 7:12:03 PM PDT by
jazusamo
(0bama to go 'full-Mussolini' after elections: Mark Levin....and the turkey has.)
To: doorgunner69
my guess is it somehow lost part of the tail cause it's waaay to long for a Bobcat
24 posted on
04/07/2015 7:12:16 PM PDT by
Chode
(Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -w- NO Pity for the LAZY - 86-44)
To: doorgunner69; jazusamo; george76
Yeah, judging by the tail, it has to be a bobcat
The face is bobcat-like too.
I think the shark is smaller than the onlookers believe.
Neat nature story!
27 posted on
04/07/2015 7:13:57 PM PDT by
Flycatcher
(God speaks to us, through the supernal lightness of birds, in a special type of poetry.)
To: doorgunner69; seantruet; george76; Flycatcher; Inyo-Mono
That’s a mountain lion that lost most of its tail. The head is not the head of a bobcat.
46 posted on
04/07/2015 7:40:50 PM PDT by
muir_redwoods
("He is a very shallow critic who cannot see an eternal rebel in the heart of a conservative." G.K .C)
To: doorgunner69
Not from the length of the tail it is not. The short tail is the result of it's last try at a shark dinner.
80 posted on
04/08/2015 4:16:50 AM PDT by
hattend
(Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson