Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Calvin Locke
I'd deny the patent because it's not so different from that car device that forces the driver to have blow into a device before enabling the ignition.

A device that mounts on the ignition of a car is not a reminder on a mobile phone that is user configurable. If you are going there, then the mandatory user input to unlock a computer is similar. . . but still not the same.

This invention can require input from a specified remote device such as a WIFI or Bluetooth capable digital scale, bluetooth sphygmomanometer for blood-pressure, or an onboard device such as the camera. That is new.

63 posted on 03/28/2015 11:51:11 AM PDT by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users contnue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Swordmaker

But the concept is for adhering to a behavior, non-court ordered I might add, as opposed just for id or a contract.


71 posted on 03/28/2015 2:03:45 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson