To: SunkenCiv
Just why did we bother saving the Kuwaitis from Saddam?
4 posted on
03/11/2015 10:12:17 AM PDT by
dfwgator
To: dfwgator
To use my old Bronx accent.....’Earl’.
8 posted on
03/11/2015 10:16:04 AM PDT by
Vaquero
(Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: dfwgator
Because Saddam in control of Kuwait was a threat to us. This is just some third-rate fake holy man calling for the destruction of the pyramids, something that has been done before.
17 posted on
03/11/2015 10:27:46 AM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW!)
To: dfwgator
Oil and money.
That’s about it.
26 posted on
03/11/2015 11:36:40 AM PDT by
Joe Boucher
( Obammy is a lie)
To: dfwgator
Darn good question.
We should have let Iraq have Kuwait and we should have let the Soviets fight on Afghanistan.
But hindsight is always 20/20.
28 posted on
03/11/2015 12:02:17 PM PDT by
Little Ray
(How did I end up in this hand-basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
To: dfwgator
Just why did we bother saving the Kuwaitis from Saddam?  A product known as oil....
I believe was the main reason... |
|
|
29 posted on
03/11/2015 12:08:01 PM PDT by
Fiddlstix
(Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson