Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg

If you can’t see the point about Fort Sumter controlling Charleston Harbor then you are a dishonest person.

You actually might be right about New Orleans having most of the cotton trade but I don’t know. I do know that Charleston was a very important Southern port. Maybe the most important one.


72 posted on 02/26/2015 5:11:43 PM PST by yarddog (Romans 8:38-39, For I am persuaded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: yarddog
If you can’t see the point about Fort Sumter controlling Charleston Harbor then you are a dishonest person.

Yeah the way the fort halted all shipping into and out of Charleston was really an act of agg...oh wait.

You actually might be right about New Orleans having most of the cotton trade but I don’t know

No, you don't. Yet that doesn't stop you from denying everything.

77 posted on 02/26/2015 5:19:00 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

To: yarddog; rockrr; Mears; X Fretensis; DoodleDawg
yarddog: "You actually might be right about New Orleans having most of the cotton trade but I don’t know.
I do know that Charleston was a very important Southern port.
Maybe the most important one."

Here is a listing of top US cities, by population, in 1860

The first thing you'll notice is that compared to such metropolises as New York (#1, with Brooklyn 1,080,000 people), Philadelphia (#2, 565,000) and Boston (#5, 178,000), Southern cities are all quite small -- with two exceptions: Baltimore (#4, 212,000) and New Orleans (#6, 167,000).

In the secessionist Deep South, in addition to New Orleans, there were three ports of note: Charleston (#22, 41,000), Mobile (#27, 29,000) and Savanah (#41, 22,000).

Also: a long list of smaller ports (Brunswick, Fernandina, Jacksonville, Cedar Key, St. Marks, Pensacola), all interconnected via railroads & telegraphs, which made it somewhat irrelevant as to which particular port a ship might land.
These small ports later became critical to Confederate blockade running ships.

Point is: there was nothing unique or special about Charleston Harbor, except, of course, that it was the heart & soul of the Slave Power's secessionism.
Plus, it was almost the only Federal property that Dough-faced Democrat President Buchanan had not already abandoned by the time Lincoln took office, on March 4, 1861.

So, for the Confederacy, the issue at Fort Sumter was their pride and honor.
For Lincoln, it was his oath of office, to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution:


104 posted on 02/27/2015 3:59:54 AM PST by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson