They never made the device. He made no hardware. It was IF someone made this device, then it could be used this way. They sued on a BUSINESS PLAN PATENT. Read the patents. Smartflash is merely the name of the business, now. . . for something that was NEVER PRODUCED or used. Apple does not use a plug-in device on any of their devices. . . and Smartflash comes in later, in 2010, after Apple develops the iTunes store to work with their Macs, iPod, and later the iPhone and iPads to modify their original patent to INCLUDE what Apple is doing WITHOUT the flash device in the original patent. . . using the same BUSINESS PLAN PATENT!
U.S. Patent Number | Date Patent of Application | Date Patent Granted |
7,334,720 | January 19, 2006 | February 26, 2008 |
7,942,317 | January 15, 2008 | May 17, 2011 |
8,033,458 | November 10, 2010 | October 11, 2011 |
8,061,598 | January 24, 2011 | November 22, 2011 |
8,118,221 | November 10, 2010 | February 21, 2012 |
8,336,772 | August 17, 2011 | December 25, 2012 |
8,794,516 | April 3, 2012 | August 5, 2014 |
Using SmartFlash's interpretation of their patents, they invented ApplePay as well. . . and any device, card, or memory device that facilitates secure payments over the Internet IF it happens to pay for digital content, clear or encrypted, because this patent is a BUSINESS PLAN PATENT. . . under the claims they used in suit unless you can show that everyone who buys anything with a Mac, iPhone, or iPad plugs a SmardFlash dongle into their device before they can pay for their purchase.
Looking more into the lawsuit, it lists several APP makers as defendants along with Apple. . . for in-app purchases. Apparently under their theory it is the iPhone, iPod touch, iPad, and Mac themselves that are the "dongle" connection for the app to make the purchase connection with the iTunes Music and App stores . . . quite a stretch of logic to apply their "invention" to a computer, a music player, a smartphone, and a tablet. . . which uses software. As I said, it is the BUSINESS MODEL PATENT which is being applied. The references at the bottom of the patents make that obvious. . . as does the need for BOTH ends of the pipeline to buy into the technology which is what sank SmartFLash as a physical product in the first place, its business model.
Now that many other companies have come up with a different business models that work, but actually do not USE the SmartFlash described techniques, they are trying to claim they invented the entire secure purchasing over the Internet to one device from another or from the internet. Just because there are superficial similarities does not make the approaches the same.
Of course, real data, facts, evidence, and reality won’t make a difference to the Apple-hating trolls who froth at the mouth to see the MOST SUCCESSFUL corporation in this nation loose something.