Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Colofornian

You missed the point of the question and your own post. I understand why the Colts would say something before the game, it’s a pretty standard thing in sport that if you think a future opponent is fond of violating Rule X you put a bug in the ref’s ear hoping for stricter enforcement. What I’m calling into question is this:
Grigson’s revelation would seem to indicate the NFL had advance knowledge and was trying to catch the Patriots in the act during the first half of the title game, and when Mike Kensil, a former Jets executive who is now the league’s director of football operations, weighed New England’s supply of balls again at halftime.

Why would the league FAIL to enforce the rule during the pregame inspection hoping to “catch the Patriots in the act during the first half”? That simply does not make sense. By properly inspecting the balls before the game that was their chance to catch them in the act AND not have it effect the game.


30 posted on 02/25/2015 2:38:01 PM PST by discostu (The albatross begins with its vengeance A terrible curse a thirst has begun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: discostu

Good question


31 posted on 02/25/2015 3:24:55 PM PST by Colofornian (Guess when it comes to flattened pigskins, Pats are ball hogs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson