[ChildOfThe60s]

I think most of us aren't interested much in hearing the dog's side of the story.

I am not being sarcastic, but IMO that says you are comfortable without getting all the facts. Suit yourself.

See, I'm not "defending" the dog. I'm saying that there is more to this than what you are reading. Although possible, I seriously doubt an attack of the magnitude described here was....."They said the dog attacked inexplicably"

May I then assume you believe everything CBS tells you about Benghazi?

[ansel12]

Well, aside from comparing this dog’s untold version of the facts, to the massive events and national security scandals involved in the loss of our ambassador and others in Benghazi, what are you thinking that we might be missing out on, by not knowing the dog’s version of events?

What do you think that we need to know, or might learn, if better investigative reporters look into this?