Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Ken H
These guys were civilians in 1880 and had dispersed around the country. How did they get such an accurate civilian count in 1880, but not in 1900?

War records. Look it up. I'm pretty sure Confederate soldiers stayed in the South, and i'm pretty sure Wounded Union soldiers likewise stayed in the North, and very likely neither group moved around a lot.

Read up on "Soldier's Disease."

The Civil war is what started narcotic addiction in this country. Prior to that, few people knew of, or had access to, large quantities of narcotics.

203 posted on 02/16/2015 3:12:22 PM PST by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
Your link says nothing about how the data was collected for 1880 and 1900, nor why data on civilians in 1880 would be more accurate than data on civilians in 1900.

Most telling of all, the people in charge of the Drug War put forth those figures without your caveats, which would have been beneficial to their argument. What we have is a situation similar to an expert witness for the prosecution giving testimony that favors the defense.

Your star witness hosed your case.

213 posted on 02/16/2015 3:36:40 PM PST by Ken H (What happens on the internet, stays on the internet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson