This is an artist's concept of the metric expansion of space, where space (including hypothetical non-observable portions of the universe) is represented at each time by the circular sections. Note on the left the dramatic expansion (not to scale) occurring in the inflationary epoch, and at the center the expansion acceleration. The scheme is decorated with WMAP images on the left and with the representation of stars at the appropriate level of development. Credit: NASA
Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2015-02-big-quantum-equation-universe.html#jCp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: SunkenCiv
Space Ping!...................
2 posted on
02/09/2015 10:55:43 AM PST by
Red Badger
(If you compromise with evil, you just get more evil..........................)
To: Red Badger
Wait, wasn’t that “settled science”??
3 posted on
02/09/2015 10:56:44 AM PST by
GeronL
To: Red Badger
Sounds like I need a shot from the Flux Capacitor to get my mind right.
To: Red Badger
But still no eternal God, the Author of Eternity ?
Making popcorn as we speak.
5 posted on
02/09/2015 10:59:28 AM PST by
knarf
(I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but, they're true)
To: Red Badger
I always get a big bang out of these conflicting theories.
6 posted on
02/09/2015 10:59:42 AM PST by
left that other site
(You shall know the Truth, and The Truth Shall Set You Free.)
To: Red Badger
If there was no beginning, then how do we explain galaxies moving away from each other today?
8 posted on
02/09/2015 11:03:23 AM PST by
VanDeKoik
To: Red Badger
these Bohmian trajectories
My contribution...Oh no, the Bohmian Triangle!!!
10 posted on
02/09/2015 11:04:01 AM PST by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: Red Badger
Sheldon will have a meltdown.
13 posted on
02/09/2015 11:06:29 AM PST by
Tax-chick
("Where's Dark Betrayal when you really need it?!?" ~James)
To: Red Badger
Our minds can hardly comprehend our own galaxy, let alone the universe.
14 posted on
02/09/2015 11:06:58 AM PST by
thefactor
(yes, as a matter of fact, i DID only read the excerpt)
To: Red Badger
"Nothing comes from nothing Nothing ever could"
15 posted on
02/09/2015 11:08:15 AM PST by
aMorePerfectUnion
( "Forward lies the crown, and onward is the goal.")
To: Red Badger
17 posted on
02/09/2015 11:13:25 AM PST by
Mike Darancette
(Not deniable = Not falsifiable = Not science.)
To: Red Badger
So after being told that you were scientifically illiterate if you didn't believe in the Big Bang....scientists will now lecture us authoritatively that there never was a Big Bang. And besides....global warming.
20 posted on
02/09/2015 11:14:52 AM PST by
rbg81
To: Red Badger
In physical terms, the model describes the universe as being filled with a quantum fluid. They were for the Aether before they were against it before they were lately for it.
22 posted on
02/09/2015 11:17:02 AM PST by
Sirius Lee
(All that is required for evil to advance is for government to do "something")
To: Red Badger
I kinda like the idea we are just a universe of universes?
And if galaxies collide and reform why not entire universes in an undiscovered space/time continuum?
The universe vs multiverse paradox.
To: Red Badger
When faced with the unknowable, we humans are inclined to use what we have experienced or observed for an explanation. i.e. We are born, live and die and our understanding of space & time is based on those certainties (a beginning, a middle and an end).
God had no beginning and has no end - He is forever and we just don’t get it.
jmho
31 posted on
02/09/2015 11:41:12 AM PST by
sodpoodle
(Life is prickly - carry tweezers.)
To: Red Badger
Well ... contrary to what some scientists says ... the universe had a definite beginning. God had told us he created it!
41 posted on
02/09/2015 12:20:10 PM PST by
Star Traveler
(Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
To: Red Badger
"The scientists propose that this fluid might be composed of gravitonshypothetical massless particles that mediate the force of gravity. If they exist, gravitons are thought to play a key role in . . . "
massless particles . . . if they exist
If a particle has no mass, in what sense does it "exist"? Are we talking metaphysics or physics?
To: Red Badger
What is the nature of the space outside of the space defined by the Big Bang Expansion? Into what space is the Big Bang expanding?
To: Red Badger
The “Big Bang” is not an adequate explanation of the origin of the universe. That does not mean that this theory is correct.
57 posted on
02/09/2015 12:51:34 PM PST by
I want the USA back
(Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country.)
To: Red Badger
The universe may have existed forever Ayn Rand believed that the law of causality does not apply to all entities. Some entities do not have a cause and thus do not come into being or pass away, but are eternal, such as the universe as a whole.
65 posted on
02/09/2015 1:46:39 PM PST by
mjp
((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson