Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dragnet2

If the driver of the lead car slammed on his brakes for no reason, he caused the accident.


63 posted on 02/08/2015 11:42:14 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (One who is merciful to those who are heartless will end up being heartless to those who are merciful)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: E. Pluribus Unum

Wrong again. One is required to follow at a safe distance so one can stop in time of a sudden event. Just because someone slams on their brakes, does not give you the right, or the excuse to rear end or blame them.


66 posted on 02/08/2015 11:45:26 AM PST by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

In addition, if you look on the street you can see painted on the street a warning of intersection/stop/crosswalk ahead.

The vehicle he rear ended was right at the limit line or very close to the intersection, which would mean if the they had the red light, the vehicle that was rear ended was braking for the intersection.


78 posted on 02/08/2015 11:52:51 AM PST by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

You must always follow at such a distance where if the car in front of you stops short, you can safely avoid them. Jenner had a trailer so he should have left even more distance. 999 out of 1,000 times the rear-ender is at fault. At least in my days of taking accident reports.


84 posted on 02/08/2015 12:03:31 PM PST by thefactor (yes, as a matter of fact, i DID only read the excerpt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson