Maybe it’s upsetting to him to have pictures of mutilated, dead bloody babies in front of his home.
I look at this every single day, usually just before I’m posting something here. Don’t you thing I find it “upsetting”? What is “upsetting” is not the pictures, because that is a dead baby, that baby no longer suffers. What is “upsetting” is that it still goes on. People see the pictures of a crime scene and in stead of going after the criminal they go after the messenger. Talk about “upsetting”.
I tire easily of abortion porn. They probably aren’t aborted fetuses but miscarriages. Why would anyone take a picture of an aborted fetus?
If you had a miscarriage, would you want your baby’s picture on someone’s sign? Not me.
If you say these are deserving of dignity as a human being, why display their dead naked bodies on a sign in order to titillate? The ends justifies the means?
An ultrasound would carry the same weight but it doesn’t have the same “porn” quality to it.