I tire easily of abortion porn. They probably aren’t aborted fetuses but miscarriages. Why would anyone take a picture of an aborted fetus?
If you had a miscarriage, would you want your baby’s picture on someone’s sign? Not me.
If you say these are deserving of dignity as a human being, why display their dead naked bodies on a sign in order to titillate? The ends justifies the means?
An ultrasound would carry the same weight but it doesn’t have the same “porn” quality to it.
Agreed. I find it to be extremely distressing. If some believe that makes me a bad person, so be it.
“They probably aren’t aborted fetuses but miscarriages.
Misscarriages don’t some out torn in pieces. Miscarriages don’t have scissors cuts in the back of the neck. Miscarriages were not burned by saline salt. Miscarriages are not stabbed in the chest or skulls with scissors. I could go on and on and maybe you might get the point. These pictures are an abortion.
“Why would anyone take a picture of an aborted fetus?”
So people will see the damn truth of what it is!!! No one believe what was going on in Nazi Germany until we saw the pictures.
Do you tire of abortion? Do you think it is murder or a choice? Why would you even believe that these pictures are not the real deal?
Hey, AppyPappy, IF you (& Trisham) wanna call such pictures "obscene"...OK, so be it. Understandable.
But "porn?"
The only tie-in is that in both porn and with abortions, you have exploited victims.
Beyond that, you have 100% distinct aspects of who is viewing those photos and for what purpose.
(And, no, I hardly think there's people out there viewing burned up and/or dismembered body parts for "jollies" purposes)
They probably aren’t aborted fetuses but miscarriages. Why would anyone take a picture of an aborted fetus? If you had a miscarriage, would you want your baby’s picture on someone’s sign? Not me.
First of all, if your son died in WWII or the Vietnamese war and some picture of his dead body emerged in the media somewhere, sure, you as the parent might not want that picture appearing anywhere...but so what?
You make it sound like the problem is the media who unveiled the photo -- and not the warfare that left you with a dead son.
Secondly, your comment here shows utter ignorance of the pro-life movement and how they've obtained these pictures through the years.
Some of the photos are admittedly of preborn babies who've been dead going back to the 1970s and 1980s. They were victims of saline solution abortions (which aren't done anymore -- to my knowledge -- at least not in the U.S.)
These are later-term babies who died by having their skin burned via a saline solution.
What began happening in the latter 1970s and 1980s is that pro-lifers began rifling thru the dumpsters of abortion clinics and made all kinds of finds, including grisly dumped babies.
In Southern California in 1982, 16,433 preborn babies' remains were found at a Woodland Hills home:
Then in the late 1980s pro-lifers were diligent in finding dismembered parts of aborted babies. Hence the short video made, "Hard Truth." And its ensuing video "Harder Truth"
Some of the pictures on signs were stills from these same sources.
Not all of the abortion pictures are intact babies; many aren't (since only the rarer late-term abortions involved leaving them intact).
I could not agree more.