....and you think this helps YOUR argument?
WChurchill's mother was American. he was born on british soil to a british father and an American mother. at birth, he was a US citizen as well as a british citizen.
BUT... he was not a natural born citizen of either country.
therefore, he could not become POTUS... insuring the founders intent
I haven’t made my argument and I’m not going to. I’ve argued over this enough the past several years. But do you actually think a man like Churchill, with obvious divided loyalties, would have been constitutionally eligible?