Are you talking about THIS sentence? And how we shouldn’t let this get in the way of a good argument? ;)
“...except for homeowners whose homes are heated solely by wood.”
We heat with wood but have a natural gas back up. The wood is free from my inlaws land (lots of free firewood)..
Why pay for gas?
The city can stick their head down my chimney, IDK.. I’m gonna burn the near free firewood.
Thank god they have not banned it here. yet.
Heated solely by wood means nothing. Just a meaningless sop. There probably aren’t three houses in SLC without some sort of heat besides wood. Its a burn ban for 99.9% of the population. And there are people who have heat but burn wood and have a need to do so.
No, this is not over reacting because of one retarded “exemption”.
Utahns for Responsible Burning, an organization strongly opposed to a seasonal ban:
-—==0==-—
Opposed=against
be certain to include the AND part of the statement in the debate:
“Homeowners whose homes are heated solely by wood and are registered with DAQ as a sole source residence would be permitted to continue heating with wood,” the DEQ said.