Obama Has Two More Years Left to Destroy the U.S.

canadafreepress.com ^ | 1/20/2015 | Alan Caruba

[rktman]

Obama now has two more years in which to try to destroy the U.S. economy; particularly its manufacturing and energy sectors. The extent to which he is putting in place the means to do that still remains largely unreported or under-reported in terms of the threat it represents.

The vehicle for the nation’s destruction is the greatest hoax of the modern era, the claim that global warming must be avoided by reducing “greenhouse gas” emissions.

[OneWingedShark]

Probably, but I'm not sure that's even as "no lose" as the others on the list; IOW it seems that an investigation into that could easily be spun as a political-attack. (Not that I'm saying it shouldn't be pursued, it should — just that it doesn't quite fit in with the "no lose" things listed… Fast and Furious is a pretty big leap, but can be ameliorated somewhat by the fact that it was plainly violation of gun-trafficking laws and treaties and could/should have been pursued on those.)

[OneWingedShark]

I am convinced the GOP is complicit and is only there to run interference for the outright socialists/libtards.

I fully agree with you that the GOP is complicit.

In the march towards socialism and the destruction of our country, when the enemy is allowed two steps forward and we only take one of those steps back, we are loosing the war.

At this point, bout the only thing we can do to smack them down w/o bloodshed is an Article V convention — here's the amendments I'd propose:
Amendment Booklet

[rktman]

I prefer that we have no need for an ambassador to a u.n. U.N.do the u.n.

[OneWingedShark]

>> I am convinced the GOP is complicit...
>
> Welcome to the UNIPARTY!!!!

Did someone say uniparty!?

IN THE GRIM DARKNESS OF THE FAR FUTURE THERE IS ONLY GOVERNMENT. [Direct Link]
The Tao of Republican Orthodoxy [Direct Link]	The Modern Democratic Party & You [Direct Link]

[stephenjohnbanker]

” I belive that the reason the GOP doesn’t act is not because “they’re scared”, but instead because they agree with the policies. “

EZ call.

[OneWingedShark]

True; I’m simply amazed at how many seem to not be picking it up, they’ve been very obvious about it in the past few years.
(For me it was seeing the lack of action w/ Fast and Furious, then the details of how Romney was pushed at the RNC that ultimately cemented the conviction that started, well, probably around `08, just before TARP.)

[Georgia Girl 2]

A good list except if it was up to me there would no longer be a Dept of Energy, Education or DHS. And I’d appoint Newt SOS.

I’d like to see Palin and Trump as trade envoys’s to the Mideast and China. Things would change. LOL!

[If You Want It Fixed - Fix It]

I bet he can’t do it! He will come awfully close, but God will save us! We must repent!

[rhubarbk]

I prefer that we have no need for an ambassador to a u.n. U.N.do the u.n.

I have to agree with you on that, no doubt about it. I would, however, like to see Bolton somewhere in the Cruz administration.

[TexasRepublic]

Relax, John Boehner will stand in the breach. Nothing will get past him. Sleep well, citizens!

[Wildbill22]

-Unilateral total disarming of our strategic nuclear arsenal.
-Total gun ban, pen an phone with the ATF, “turn them all in”.
-Republican? IRS audit, automatic.
-Taxes? Increasing? BWAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!
-All Mexican citizens are now Democrats, and can vote.
-All Islamic terrorists free. But new crack downs on Tea Party.
-Free speech? Yea, for democrats. Only.
-Private property? Better declare yourself a democrat. Soon.

Oh, this will be a very long two years possibly.

[glennaro]

You certainly make some valid points. Thanks for taking the time.

[OneWingedShark]

Thank you.
I wish I was “wronger than righter”, but the crap (a) w/ retaining Boehner, and (b) with the GOP push for amnesty [even before the Nov elections] makes me think that’s not the case.

[GeronL]

His bureaucracy and his judges will be around for decades, not just 2 years

[OneWingedShark]

His bureaucracy and his judges will be around for decades, not just 2 years

Irrelevant; why?
Because Congress has the power to reign in judges and bureaucracy; that they do not is evidence that they are ok with it.

Just look at the backpedaling on repeal of ObamaCare now that the Republicans have won.

[GeronL]

Congress has the power, but will do nothing with it

[OneWingedShark]

Congress has the power, but will do nothing with it

Very much agreed, though there is the question of Why? — personally I think it's because this way that can shuffle responsibility/accountability off, much like they do with the EPA, the NSA, the BATFE, the IRS — these are deeply unpopular agencies, with [current] records of abuse, yet the congress does nothing to reign them in because they really do agree with the policies, regulations, being instituted by the agencies.