Despite your neutral, even scholarly, tone your points are all "catastrophically flawed", and amount to nothing more than denial of the obvious -- all of which I'll explain in depth as time permits, which sadly, is not now...
What is obvious is that Darwin called his own fouls, and any one of those errata discounts the entire theory - And those errata exist to this day. To move Darwinian Evolution forward as science (rather than religion), each of those errata (and more, btw) must be disproved and explained. True science is not about proving a theory, but rather, in disproving the theory, no matter how pretty it is. The theory must withstand all criticism, and criticism should be rigorous.
Anthropological Global Warming should be a very big clue as to the state of modern science. If you have a brain in your head, you should find AGW an absurdity on it's face, with proven tampering with evidence only reinforcing the ludicrous nature of the claim... One would look at it, no doubt, with a very jaundiced eye.
With that same skeptical view (which I submit, is proper science), one can see that the very same conditions exist within modern evolution theory (with the same sort of tampering from the very beginning). I am in the comfortable position of needing only to point to ONE point of error - I don't even have to provide a reasonable alternative... That one point of error collapses the entirety of the theory.
I shouldn't need to remind people that it isn't the abundance of evidence that proves a theory, but rather, the utter absence of error. That which is supposedly obvious is not necessarily true.
Homo sapiens, ( Latin: “wise man”)
Rom 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools [...]