Posted on 01/17/2015 5:36:53 PM PST by Libloather
**SNIP**
The former teenage “sex slave” Virginia Roberts at the center of the sex scandal ensnaring Prince Andrew revealed that she met Bill Clinton on pedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s “orgy island”
In an extraordinary tale of power, influence and sexual abuse, Virginia told the National Enquirer’s investigative reporter Sharon Chrurcher that Hillary was nowhere to be seen when on at least two occasions Bill visited his billionaire pal Epstein’s estates in New York and the U.S. Virgin Islands, which were plastered with pornographic photos of her and other girls in his underage harem.
Far from being shamed when the tycoon was jailed in 2008 for soliciting an underage girl for prostitution, we have also learned Bill remained close to Epstein’s aide, Ghislaine Maxwell, who recruited Virginia as the pervert’s “top” sex slave.
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalenquirer.com ...
Resume enhancer for democrats. The more debauched and perverted the better. The only condemnation I have heard is that there weren’t any black girls in the sucks harem.
All I know is that I have never sat next to an olive skinned woman, rode a private jet, or been attracted to a woman under the age of 19 and three quarters.
Read the news, there are more serious abuses happening in this world that this story is trying to bury...
When I read about this “story” I think of the George Carlin quote “it’s a special club, and we ain’t in it.”
“They” cover for each other; the powerful need the rich and vice versa.
What surprises me most about this is not the dirty doings (right under the noses of the 24/7 Clinton Secret Service detail) but that the National Enquirer is publishing it at all.
ISNT a majority owner of the NE Clinton buddy Roger Altman (thru a company that owns a percent of American Media-the company that is the National Enquirer?). And that with Buckingham Palace (Prince Andrew ) and the Clintons (along w/sundry gazillionaires) trying to stamp this firestorm of a story out, that ANYTHING is being published is just amazing.
So there must always only be a single news story at a time, and nothing else gets mentioned until your top problem is fixed?
Why do you want to bury this story, as Bill’s wife prepares her presidential run?
“I knew Bill was a sleaze dog. But he was very funny, very charming, a down-to-earth guy.”
So what was it that she was a slave to? could it have been money?
It is quite a story but one that is familiar since the beginning of history.
The actions of Presidents in their personal life have been well known over the years, what Clinton did was make it more public and he was still voted in.
Why was both Clinton and Obama voted in the second time? because the socialists put socialism first.
The red blooded Americans put moral issues first so if the contenders can not measure up to Reagan they are out.
Herman Cain for instance was accused of just a bit of what Clinton was proved to have done and he was shunned by the American people so we have a socialist president.
The reason of course is because good people will not vote for some one who will do what they them selves would do under the same circumstances.
We hold our leaders to a higher standard than what we hold ourselves.
Is sexual temptation any different with a red blooded
American than it is with a socialist? I think not.
The only difference is in promotion of the standard and in some cases not even that.
If the only difference in Americanism with our constitutional freedom and socialism is sex then we are wasting our time even going to the polls.
Huh?
I don’t like the National Enquirer calling it “orgy island” when the official name is “Sex Fiend Island.”
Which part don’t you understand, the one asking you why you think only one news story at a time can be covered, or the part asking why you want to bury this story about Hillary’s husband as she starts her run for president?
That silliness won't work for Hillary.
The press isn't mesmerized by the ‘bad boy's’ wife. And strong women know Hillary got to the top by marrying the 'right man'... so they're not going to fall behind her either.
Also, there are a few thousand pre-teens going to get raped to death in the Middle East and Africa tonight, if any of my righteous brothers and sisters on this forum care...
Huh?
Posting in agreement with this post & wondering what the reply ‘huh?’ meant. So I am replying with a ‘huh?’ to your ‘huh?’
Why won’t you tell us why you want this story about Hillary’s husband buried as she positions herself to become the democrat president?
Did any of the comments posted on this thread infer anything of the sort? If I did I didn’t mean to compare one headline to another. Or in anyway promote HillBillery.
Yes.
To: ansel12
Read the news, there are more serious abuses happening in this world that this story is trying to bury...
63 posted on 1/18/2015, 9:15:43 AM by BigIsleGal
The premise, “of good men allowing evil, by doing nothing to prevent evil”, is idiotic. Perhaps, such lying/agreeing is easy, when a population is fearfully ignorant of basic truth. Here is a statement of truth- “Good men, kill evil.” There is no substitute, for truth.
Ain’t you a dandy, lily lil golux...
According to excerpts obtained by the Tribune, Schippers called the Senate trial a "flat out rigged ball game, what we in Chicago would refer to as a first-ward election," a reference to a ward with a history of corrupt elections.
The former federal prosecutor wrote that when Hyde and the managers met with Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott (R-Miss.), Lott told them, "Henry, you're not going to dump this garbage on us." And, Schippers said, when Lott spoke of bipartisanship, "We knew that he was waving a white flag."
Lott's office had no comment. Neither did the office of Sen. Ted Stevens (R-Alaska), quoted in the book as telling Hyde, "Henry, I don't care if you prove he raped a woman and then stood up and shot her dead--you are not going to get 67 votes" to remove the president.
Schippers, a lifelong Democrat, said Democrats "in both houses sold out basic principles of law and decency for the sake of protecting one of their own."
"Most distressingly, the president of the United States of America and his White House waterboys sold out the American people--not just in a one-time spasm of political expedience, but in a deliberate snarl of sophistry and cynical manipulation of public opinion, the singular aim of which was political self-preservation," he wrote ...................
“...But America is HIS. It belongs to Barack,...”
unfortunately, you speak the truth in that the America that once was is no longer, thanks to those who thought a melanin-enhanced candidate was just what America needed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.