Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
In any field truth is the enemy of those with less-than-honorable agendas.
2 posted on
01/10/2015 12:25:40 PM PST by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: MeshugeMikey; Tolerance Sucks Rocks; SunkenCiv; Marine_Uncle; TigersEye; Fred Nerks; GeronL; ...
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Geez... how many nails does this coffin take?
4 posted on
01/10/2015 12:28:48 PM PST by
Kirkwood
(Zombie Hunter)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
5 posted on
01/10/2015 12:29:26 PM PST by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
And .. the hokus-pokus garbage continues to try to prove global warming and all sorts of junk science.
6 posted on
01/10/2015 12:30:46 PM PST by
CyberAnt
("The hope and changey stuff did not work, even a smidgen.")
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
“But all the Science is in..” /s
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
What happened to “acid rain”
20 years ago that was all we heard from the MSM here in the midwest and east.
The forests were defoliating at a prodigious rate!
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The politicians who jump on board with this fraud should be forced to walk the plank into their so-called “acid ocean.”
9 posted on
01/10/2015 12:33:37 PM PST by
jonrick46
(The opium of Communists: other people's money.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
When I was a kid we called this sort of thing FRAUD, They ALL BELONG IN PRISON.
When you realize that all of this FRAUD was used to get MONEY from the TAXPAYERS, Prison is probably too lenient.
10 posted on
01/10/2015 12:33:53 PM PST by
eyeamok
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Fascinating, but not surprising! I teach General Biology in our local community college. My colleagues are great people and some are even Christians as I am, but they stubbornly cling to the idea of AGW. Scientists are taught that they should be objective in their interpretation of experimental data, but in this case they are completely biased. I do my best to be the lone voice of reason in the department and to make my students aware of the contradictory evidence so they can at least have all the information they need to make their own decision.
12 posted on
01/10/2015 12:40:41 PM PST by
srmorton
(Deut. 30 19: "..I have set before you life and death,....therefore, choose life..")
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
If anyone had bothered to actually plot the confidence intervals for that data, they find a fairly large spread about the linear regression. You could potentially fit a slew of regressions to that data and it would still be within the bounds of probability because the data is clearly cyclical. Lots of problems fitting 2nd order linear regressions to cyclical data unless there is a secondary overlaid trend occurring.
13 posted on
01/10/2015 12:41:23 PM PST by
Kirkwood
(Zombie Hunter)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Oops, someone’s going to lose their grant money.
14 posted on
01/10/2015 12:41:43 PM PST by
Telepathic Intruder
(The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
That makes sense. Anyone who studies diatoms knows that they lock up an amazing amount of carbon.
21 posted on
01/10/2015 1:12:29 PM PST by
tanuki
(Left-wing Revolution: show biz for boring people.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I had a twenty-something “scientist” gal try to convince me that the oceans were acidifying. She couldn’t even identify her data set or how they determined a baseline for ocean acidity. That’s the state of science in America.
22 posted on
01/10/2015 1:20:38 PM PST by
1010RD
(First, Do No Harm)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I had a circa 1850 book and they had a long article on this PH thing so I think they picked their own cutoff dates.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
> experts decided that computer simulations in 2014 were better at measuring the pH in 1910 than the pH meters were.
The Richard Feynman quote seems appropriate here.
Compare it directly with observation to see if it works. If it disagrees with experiment, it's wrong. In that simple statement is the key to science. It doesn't make a difference how beautiful your guess is, it doesn't make a difference how smart you are, who made the guess or what his name is. If it disagrees with experiment, it's wrong. -- Video
25 posted on
01/10/2015 1:41:45 PM PST by
ArcadeQuarters
("Immigration Reform" is ballot stuffing)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
26 posted on
01/10/2015 1:44:03 PM PST by
gasport
(Immigration reform means arriving in air-conditioned comfort.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Thank you for posting this! Good stuff.
27 posted on
01/10/2015 1:44:42 PM PST by
outofsalt
( If history teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Everywhere you look you see these pukes lyings their behinds off for money. There is a dispicable collusion between government and scientific studies that has to be stopped!
32 posted on
01/10/2015 2:50:26 PM PST by
vpintheak
(Keep calm and Rain Steel!)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
This is Settled Science:
![](http://blogs-images.forbes.com/erikaandersen/files/2012/03/w1467103173.jpg)
33 posted on
01/10/2015 2:54:43 PM PST by
Rodamala
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson