Skip to comments.
Sarah Palin under fire for posting photo of her son standing on the family dog in New Year's message
DAILY MAIL ^
| January 1, 2015
| MIA DE GRAAF
Posted on 01/02/2015 10:11:35 AM PST by Bratch
Sarah Palin has sparked outrage by posting pictures on Facebook of her son standing on her dog.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: dog; doggieping; dogsurfing; labrador; muchadoaboutnothing; obama; obamaateadog; obamaatedog; palin; palinfamily; peta; sarahpalin; trig
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240, 241-260, 261-280 ... 761-775 next last
To: uncitizen
Look at the desperation of the ‘mortified’ PETA members on this thread. The MSM has NOTHING on them RE false outrage.
To: Norm Lenhart
I wanna be like the enlightened ones! Because CLEARLY they are smarter, more moral and have better dog skills than us lowlifes!!
You have a valid point. Yes, we all need to study their ways and byways and improve our lot. Carry onward...
To: donna
243
posted on
01/02/2015 1:04:35 PM PST
by
Altariel
("Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!")
To: Norm Lenhart
I think you are flipping out more than anybody on this thread.
244
posted on
01/02/2015 1:06:02 PM PST
by
Irenic
(The pencil sharpener and Elmer's glue is put away-- we've lost the red wheelbarrow)
To: ScottinVA
The worship reference was directed not at you, but at her church deacon.
In the post addressed only to me.
I yield to your right-of-way to plow ahead.
To: Joe 6-pack; Salamander
Doggie ping
246
posted on
01/02/2015 1:07:35 PM PST
by
Altariel
("Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!")
To: Bratch
He is not standing on the dog. He has one foot on the dog’s back. There is obviously no weight on the dog.
This is what they do. They deliberately and intentionally misuse words. The media picks up the misused words, and the left then uses them everywhere, every time it can, and never lets go.
Truth doesn’t matter.
247
posted on
01/02/2015 1:12:20 PM PST
by
I want the USA back
(Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country.)
To: Irenic; Norm Lenhart
I think you are flipping out more than anybody on this thread.
You are correct again.
Norm, please gather yourself together and restore the expected decorum on this thread that features some known PDSers making appearances to speak out for dog welfare and commonsense with how to raise Down Syndrome boys.
(Pen both of them up behind Bristol's apartment?)
To: trisham
It appears Trig sees the dog as an “inanimate object” rather than a flesh and blood dog that could be hurt.
It was a teachable moment IF she had explained to him the dog could be seriously hurt by standing on him/her. Plus, as some say, if the dog left, Trig would be on the floor, hitting whatever on his way down.
I'm neutral about Palin. She seems to talk in “catchy sayings”, rather than in specifics and that is troublesome.
249
posted on
01/02/2015 1:14:31 PM PST
by
Marcella
(Prepping can save your life today. Going Galt is freedom.)
To: ScottinVA
LOL, what is obvious is your years of anti-Palin sniping and back biting. Exposed.
250
posted on
01/02/2015 1:14:44 PM PST
by
ansel12
(They hate us, because they ain't us.)
To: I want the USA back
251
posted on
01/02/2015 1:14:53 PM PST
by
Altariel
("Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!")
To: Norm Lenhart
Think back of how silent tie PETA and others were when the BLM shot and buried Bundy’s cows. Both PETA and the SPCA were silent as church mice.
252
posted on
01/02/2015 1:15:19 PM PST
by
sport
To: Marcella
It appears Trig sees the dog as an inanimate object rather than a flesh and blood dog that could be hurt. Not at all, that is why most of us see this as sweet and warm, they clearly love each other.
253
posted on
01/02/2015 1:15:55 PM PST
by
ansel12
(They hate us, because they ain't us.)
To: cuban leaf
“Will she ever be required to pay rent for residing in their heads? :-D”
Nah, that’s vacant space anyway.
254
posted on
01/02/2015 1:15:59 PM PST
by
Pelham
(Treason, not just for Democrats anymore)
To: Bratch
It’s good to know that the left is still very much afraid of Sarah.
To: Marcella
Bingo. This is an opportunity for Sarah to explain to Trig that animals are capable of feeling pain and may *hide pain* to keep from showing weakness.
If he is literally mentally incapable of understanding that one does not treat living creatures like inanimate objects, he is not mentally capable of being given unsupervised access to the family pets (which he clearly had for him to step onto the dog’s back).
Also, since she knows that Trig likes to help with the dishes, why isn’t there a stepping stool by the sink?
256
posted on
01/02/2015 1:18:16 PM PST
by
Altariel
("Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!")
To: sport
Yup. Remember that well. PETA only fusses cows when they benefit the right. Like with luxuries like food.
When their death benefits a Democrat? BBQ!!!
To: Black Agnes
The animals probably see the kid’s three guardian angels. :-)
To: Bratch
To: Irenic
It’s called “Illustrating absurdity by being absurd”. Perhaps you have heard of the concept.
Rush made millions on it. Because it works.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240, 241-260, 261-280 ... 761-775 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson