...and they expect this group of radicals to tell the truth? Stupid.
Isn’t the whole point of being gay to have as many anonymous partners as possible?
Yet another newly discovered “right” found in the penumbra?
we’re sacrificing the safety of the nation’s blood supply so a favored special interest group feels good about themselves
So, the American blood supply will now be completely at the mercy of the honor system involving people who regularly lie about sex?
Note to self: Try not to never need a transfusion.
No way a queer can go more that 24 hours without shoving his winky up some other dude’s bung hole. That’s their whole purpose in life.
What could go wrong?
In this context the term ‘abstinent’ will require a strict legal definition; and we will soon learn that it doesn’t mean what we think it means.
Being a pervert now trumps public safety!
Who will keeping queer score?
Newlywed Game
Bob Eubanks (host): “Where is the strangest place you
and your wife have ever had sex?”
Contestant: “Dat be da butt, Bob”.
From what I understand (and this could be outdated info, so feel free to correct me), AIDS is caused by a “Retrovirus”.
The very definition of a “Retrovirus” is that it can lay dormant for MANY years before blossoming into an infection.
Because of this, anyone who has had male-male sex, anyone who has had illicit intravenous drug use, and anyone who has worked in an AIDS infected area such as Haiti or parts of Africa, should be banned from donating blood, except for their own use.
In fact, if they were sincere about increasing the blood supply, they should just donate for their own use, thus freeing up the non-AIDS-Related Blood Supply.
This would not be picking on homosexuals, as other high risk groups are included.
The fact that this is not even considered proves that it is not “altruism” that fuels this controversy, but the furtherance of their own agenda.
Our entire Blood Supply is being put at risk to be PC for a few LBGTQs!
This is one of the more despicable and dangerous things the Obama Administration has done. The consequences are potentially beyond our ability to calculate. The same people were those who 2 decades ago warned that everyone, not just gays and drug users, was vulnerable.
Now, apparently they’re saying no one is susceptible to HIV/AIDS through a blood transfusion from a gay man who’s been celibate (wink/wink) for a year. Just watch as ‘designated blood banks’ emerge.
Celibate gay men, didn’t John Rechy used to write about that?
Just kidding of course.
Soon, anonymous posts will flood the net by militant homos with AIDS that donated intentionally to try killing hetros.
See ACT UP in the 80s for details.
So the FDA, which holds up the introduction of life-saving drugs for years by demanding the most rigorous imaginable scientific testing is now going to base a major public health decision on the honesty of men committed to a life of buggery?
Folks, liberalism is not only a mental disorder but a deadly disease of the mind.
Do “abstinent” homosexuals really exist? I think they are probably like unicorns.
yes of course!
The aids virus carries a calendar with it and
promises to LEAVE
by the end of a year!