To: BenLurkin
2 posted on
12/23/2014 5:12:19 PM PST by
knarf
To: knarf
My thought exactly. 300 million exactly? How was the date measured? Was it by index fossils or other method. I read the article, you are never told how the figure was arrived at.
4 posted on
12/23/2014 5:20:28 PM PST by
Fungi
(There is more to Fungi than the eye can see.)
To: knarf
now the evolutionists are trying to believe that tissue can be preserved this long without being replaced by mineralization. after telling us for so long it was impossible they were young specimens because they’d otherwise have been totally fossilized.
i guess when you can have it both ways when it works for you, who needs consistency in “science”?
7 posted on
12/23/2014 5:28:19 PM PST by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson