To: knarf
now the evolutionists are trying to believe that tissue can be preserved this long without being replaced by mineralization. after telling us for so long it was impossible they were young specimens because they’d otherwise have been totally fossilized.
i guess when you can have it both ways when it works for you, who needs consistency in “science”?
7 posted on
12/23/2014 5:28:19 PM PST by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: Secret Agent Man
What are you talking about? The scientific paper referred to in the article is titled - "Mineralized rods and cones suggest colour vision in a 300 Myr-old fossil fish"
10 posted on
12/23/2014 5:32:47 PM PST by
Natufian
(t)
To: Secret Agent Man
14 posted on
12/23/2014 6:05:02 PM PST by
Fungi
(There is more to Fungi than the eye can see.)
To: Secret Agent Man
i guess when you can have it both ways when it works for you, who needs consistency in “science”? Yeah this stuff here sounds about as scientific as manmade global warming.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson