Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Sorry, too lazy to edit html today.
1 posted on 12/10/2014 2:18:28 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: LibWhacker

I have no doubt that God encoded a propensity for life into the laws of the universe!


2 posted on 12/10/2014 2:20:59 PM PST by GraceG (Protect the Border from Illegal Aliens, Don't Protect Illegal Alien Boarders...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

What dreams did the parents hold for their child when they named (him?) Attila?


3 posted on 12/10/2014 2:22:45 PM PST by txnativegop (Tired of liberals, even a few in my own family.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
nonsense.
4 posted on 12/10/2014 2:23:58 PM PST by Fungi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker; betty boop; marron; Alamo-Girl; Jacquerie; CottShop; metmom; xzins; GodGunsGuts; ...
A physical theory of life . . . speaking “broadly.”

BEEP!

7 posted on 12/10/2014 2:33:13 PM PST by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
yadda yadda yadda yadda This could mean that under certain conditions yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda

In other words, he's got nuttin'.

My money remains on Yahweh, the Creator. When He speaks, Life results!

9 posted on 12/10/2014 2:53:22 PM PST by Nervous Tick (There is no "allah" but satan, and mohammed is his demon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
I can go two ways on this … from the Bible.
The FIRST is obvious: Then again, I could point to the SECOND and say
that they are searching for HOW God CREATED LIFE where there was NO LIFE (But I seriously doubt that they believe in God) : I'm pretty sure the FIRST is more applicable than the SECOND.
12 posted on 12/10/2014 3:06:02 PM PST by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

“liberate biologists from seeking a Darwinian explanation”

An admission that Darwinism is a burden for the biologists.


13 posted on 12/10/2014 3:07:38 PM PST by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Sounds easy enough. Now, go ahead and make me some life Poindexter. I’ll wait.


17 posted on 12/10/2014 3:24:01 PM PST by 762X51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

He has hit upon something. This bears further research.


20 posted on 12/10/2014 3:39:47 PM PST by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

“The ‘big hope’ is that he has identified the underlying physical principle driving the origin and evolution of life, Grosberg said.”

And the fact that this “principle” is missing is hardly ever acknowledged.


22 posted on 12/10/2014 3:46:15 PM PST by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

I can’t believe the “community” has gotten so stupid they would let this kid take credit for this.

There have been a constant stream of scientists explaining that life is simple the most efficient way of dissipating useable energy into entropic energy.

I guarantee there are thousands of scientists saying “but we already know this!” None the less they will give this kid some kind of award.

Same thing happened back when “punctuated evolution” was “discovered”. It was already known. Duh.

This is what happens when the dumb half are in charge.


24 posted on 12/10/2014 3:50:42 PM PST by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Apparently, this young snot-nose hasn’t heard of they Miller-Urey experiment and how it was shown for the nonsense it is, or chirality and its consequences for amino acids. Just another supra-materialist in over his head.


27 posted on 12/10/2014 3:59:01 PM PST by backwoods-engineer (Blog: www.BackwoodsEngineer.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

It makes sense to me. I have long thought that life is the rule not the exception in the universe in general.


29 posted on 12/10/2014 4:28:00 PM PST by TigersEye (ISIS is the tip of the spear. The spear is Islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
“Snowflakes, sand dunes and turbulent vortices all have in common that they are strikingly patterned structures that emerge in many-particle systems driven by some dissipative process,” he said.

This could be right out of Ilya Progogine's musings on "Systems driven far from equilibrium". I always thought these were very reasonable ideas, but he tried to build them into something they weren't, that is a coherent theory.

Cf. Horgan's THE END OF SCIENCE, Ilya Prigogine and the end of Certainty pg.216. Also relevant, The Mysterious Origins of Life pg. 138

... "The origin of life is a science writer's dream. It abounds with exotic scientists and exotic theories, which are never entirely abandoned or accepted, but merely go in and out of fashion."

Great book! ( 1996 )

37 posted on 12/10/2014 8:25:52 PM PST by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Another day, another fool says in his heart ...


38 posted on 12/10/2014 8:35:51 PM PST by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
Let me recap - luck had nothing to do with it so it's better than current evolution theories because it is even further from God. Because of the laws, some random clumps will rearrange themselves to become life. vs. some other random events occurring to electrify some random clumps into life.

Don't know why we didn't realize it long ago - perhaps our living clumps hadn't yet reorganized themselves to the point where we could grasp it.

Of course, with the requirement to change in order to dissipate heat more efficiently, one can see that global warming is going to become an even bigger threat.

41 posted on 12/11/2014 3:28:22 AM PST by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Did Mr. England explain the light source, or the external energy source? I didn’t see it in the article.

Thanks.

5.56mm


43 posted on 12/11/2014 10:11:35 AM PST by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

If it is possible, it will happen eventually and forever.

Infinity will have its days.


45 posted on 12/11/2014 3:56:25 PM PST by soycd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson