Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: jurroppi1; Gaffer

I did some reading and it does sound like there 2/3rds present is relating to the quorum requirement. If worse came to worse, the absent members could be compelled to attend for the ratification process (if subversion was indeed the aim, I don’t see why anyone present would want to compel members that would vote contrary anyhow).

I could see the language of the constitution as a whole being ignored or bastardized by this congress in just such a way as I questioned previously though.


62 posted on 12/03/2014 5:29:12 AM PST by jurroppi1 (The only thing you "pass to see what's in it" is a stool sample. h/t MrB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: jurroppi1

Thanks..... I think, however, there are enough procedural delaying tactics that could forestall a midnight vote....I’m hoping anyway...

If I was an out-of-town Senator who wanted to vote against it, I might not be too saddened to hear of a phoned-in warning of some kind, for example. :0)


63 posted on 12/03/2014 5:34:40 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson