Posted on 11/26/2014 8:18:09 AM PST by SWAMPSNIPER
If anything happens to Wilson and/or his home and it can be traced back to the NYT’s posting of his address should they be held liable? Maybe, we should publish the writer’s address as well. See how that toad likes it.
(Excerpt) Read more at clashdaily.com ...
Check out the websites printed on the signs at these protests. These riots are orchestrated by white communist agitators, who read the NY Times religiously.
Not only would they be willing to share such information with an unstable moronic thug, they'd probably drop him off in the neighborhood after dark.
Yes, that’s true! The couple were forced to flee their home - which might happen to this young police officer now that his address is out there. Or it may be torched.
The Google images of the two places are a bit disappointing. I expected to see nicer diggs.
Perhaps NYT doesn’t pay so well.
Absolutely!
revcom.us in Ferguson.
ANSWER in DC.
You should be a strategist.
Journalistic ethics? If these were journalists that would apply. These are just the promotional arm of the Dimwit party.
Taken Phone Speech
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZOywn1qArI
Guess I will send them both postcards from hell.
Just go on a pro-Brown social media site and say that you heard a rumor that Darren Wilson is having Thanksgiving dinner with one of those reporters.
Let them feel Wilson’s pain for a day.
Journalistic ethics? What’s that.
No /s
Do you know that the editor in chief of the NYT is Dean Baquet who is black.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dean_Baquet
At a minimum we should flood their home mailboxes with appropriate contents. Ideas are welcome.
Yeah. . but conservatives, unlike insane liberals, do not stalk and harass those that they disagree with politically.
well done
LOL. . . .priceless. . .
Which I would happily deliver personally if I lived in either Chicago or New Orleans.
You can’t lie to a nun.
When someone is sufficiently malicious or dangerous, I believe posting their address is acceptable. As one example, when a journalist posts the address of an innocent person to help thugs in finding and harming the innocent person, I'm okay with the poetic justice in posting the evil journalist's address. To take a worse case, when the most dangerous terrorist in the history of our country continues to damage America, I'm okay with posting the address where he is hiding out (highlight to read): 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC 20500 . . .
My reference to “journalistic ethics” drew four comments along the line of “no such thing.” I’ll have to zip my lips and NOT mention that tomorrow at Thanksgiving dinner, held at my sister’s house. She and her husband are recently-retired journalists.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.