Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Morgana

If there is such a thing as a “gay gene”, then it must be a genetic defect. It seems to me that any genetic condition that would prevent procreation would have to be a defect.

I could see “gay rights” being justified under the A.D.A., however offensive many may consider that notion.

Next question, if it is a genetic defect, would a “cure” be justified?


19 posted on 11/19/2014 8:45:57 AM PST by RangerM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RangerM

There are a couple of things driving the tendency to choose that lifestyle...

Childhood sex abuse is a huge factor. But any study linking the two would never see the light of day.

Another is the male sex drive and sin nature of not desiring to control it.


21 posted on 11/19/2014 8:50:09 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson