Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin

So the results are rather inconclusive. For me, thats a good reason to do it again with the next comet to pass by. Maybe the results of these measurements can help us tweak the instrument package we plant on the next one, but we should definitely do it again.

They should use a tiny nuclear source, like Cassini, so they aren’t dependent on solar power. That seems silly, to go to all that time and expense and you’re depending on a solar panel to catch sunlight from a zillion miles away.

I wish the satellite headed for Pluto would drop a lander on the surface there too.


24 posted on 11/19/2014 10:04:39 AM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: marron

I wish the satellite headed for Pluto would drop a lander on the surface there too.

...

New Horizons is hauling butt. It doesn’t have enough fuel to slow down and go in orbit, much less land. Pluto’s low mass doesn’t help either.


28 posted on 11/19/2014 3:57:18 PM PST by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: marron
They should use a tiny nuclear source, like Cassini, so they aren’t dependent on solar power. That seems silly, to go to all that time and expense and you’re depending on a solar panel to catch sunlight from a zillion miles away.

They had to be politically correct and green.

38 posted on 11/23/2014 12:06:01 PM PST by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users contnue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson